Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters raise development-rights concerns and urge county to end water fluoridation
Summary
During public comment, speakers raised two substantive civic issues: development rights and traffic impacts at a recent Casa development, and separate calls for Indian River County to stop fluoridating the public water supply citing health and legal concerns; commissioners did not take action on the fluoride request at the meeting.
Several members of the public addressed the commission during the Jan. 14 meeting on two substantive topics: development rights associated with a local housing project and calls to end water fluoridation in Indian River County.
Tom Sullivan, a resident, addressed the board about the Casa development and said the project's evolution raised questions about transfer or sale of development rights. Sullivan described a parcel originally planned for higher density that was later reduced, and said he was concerned that an owner had sold acreage and development rights that allowed a large number of units to be built elsewhere. "When someone has the plat that you've assigned them the rights, you haven't assigned them the right to sell the rights," Sullivan said, urging commissioners to consider the implications of such transfers when public infrastructure investments — he cited a county traffic fix — benefit subsequent development.
Two speakers urged the board to end fluoridation of the county water system and said they believed adding fluoride to municipal water is unlawful and harmful. Carolyn Lang told commissioners she and others view fluoride as a medicine that should not be dispensed without informed consent, and she said studies associate fluoride exposure with reduced IQ in children. Dina Accardi likewise urged removal of fluoride and referenced a federal court finding she said links fluoride to neurotoxicity; she cited Florida statutes (859.01 and 381.026) and urged the board to place the issue on a future agenda.
County staff did not take action on the fluoride request during the meeting. Commissioners and staff noted public-comment rights and said the proper procedural path for policy changes would be formal agenda placement and staff analysis. No resolution, ordinance or staff directive to remove fluoridation was made during the session.
