Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Caldwell council approves annexation and C‑3 zoning for Mason Creek Commons with landscaping, pedestrian and height conditions
Summary
The Caldwell City Council unanimously approved annexation, rezoning and a preliminary commercial plat for Mason Creek Commons, a 13.08‑acre site at Middleton Road and Highway 2026, attaching conditions on landscaping, pedestrian access and building height adjacent to homes.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Caldwell City Council unanimously approved annexation, a comprehensive‑plan map amendment and preliminary plat for Mason Creek Commons — a proposed commercial subdivision at the northwest corner of Middleton Road and Highway 2026 — during its Jan. 6 meeting.
Staff presented the application as an annexation of 13.08 acres to be initially zoned C‑3 (service commercial), an amendment to the comprehensive‑plan future‑land‑use map from highway corridor to commercial service, and a preliminary commercial plat. The Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended approval on Nov. 13. Katie Wright, associate planner, told council staff had found the proposal met applicable parking, landscaping, bulk‑standard and subdivision requirements and that utilities or required improvements would be available as outlined in the engineering report.
Why it matters: the council’s decision changes the parcel’s jurisdiction and allows more intensive commercial and semi‑industrial uses in an area that currently borders single‑family neighborhoods and highway‑oriented land uses. The approval includes conditions intended to limit impacts on adjacent residences and address pedestrian access and landscaping.
Key conditions and council directions summarized from staff and council discussion include: - Buildings immediately adjacent to single‑family homes shall be no taller than 25 feet to the midpoint. - Storage‑building colors and materials (minimum two) must be approved at building permit review by staff. - If Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) does not install streetlights or sidewalks along Highway 2026 as part of its improvements, the applicant must provide those improvements at the time of first building permit. - The applicant must provide a sidewalk or other pedestrian connection through the site between the storage use and the other commercial uses, rather than routing pedestrians along the canal at the north edge; future development to the west must be allowed to connect to that pathway.
Public testimony: two proponents representing the applicant — Chad Jones (developer representative) and Jeff Lykes (ALC Architecture) — described the project as a mix of mini‑storage (approximately 3.7 acres of the site), car‑oriented services (drive‑through restaurants, convenience/gas, banks) and retail uses, and said they had been coordinating with Highway District No. 4 and Idaho Water Resources matters. Stacy Behrens, a nearby resident, testified she had submitted photos and a letter of concern about vegetation loss and the condition of the Mason Creek embankment; she said plantings previously installed had died and asked that landscaping and creek remediation be completed and not “lost in the shuffle.”
Staff response and follow up: Wright said the county had opened a code case and later closed it after compliance; staff noted photos of dead plantings were included in the packet and that the applicant indicated a replanting plan and broader revegetation as part of the landscape program. The council specifically acknowledged the resident’s concerns and included conditions to verify landscape plans and planting at building permit.
Formal actions: Councilor motioned to approve the case (A N N 24‑7) based on the staff findings of fact and conclusions of law, adding the signage/monument sign condition discussed at councilor Williams’ request. A subsequent motion passed to adopt bill 51 / ordinance 3612 (annexation ordinance) by title and to approve the summary for publication. Both motions passed unanimously.
What happens next: the specific land uses and site details will be reviewed at building‑permit stage; staff will verify parking by use, the applicant must meet the site‑specific conditions recorded in the findings of fact, and the special‑use permit for traditional mini‑storage in C‑3 remains as approved by P&Z.
Council recorded thanks to the applicant and acknowledged the resident for raising the landscaping concerns; council directed staff and the applicant to ensure the agreed landscaping and creek remediation obligations are completed as part of permit and construction sequencing.

