Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County interviews three firms for emergency-management contract; decision deferred pending one more interview
Summary
Rio Blanco County held interviews with three firms responding to a request for proposals to provide emergency-management services. Commissioners heard presentations from the finalists and will hold a final interview before making a selection; the emergency manager will report to the board, not to administration staff, if the contract is awarded.
Rio Blanco County commissioners on Feb. 11 interviewed three firms that responded to a county request for proposals to provide emergency-management services as a contracted rather than employee position.
Why the county issued the RFP County leaders said they separated the emergency manager function from the county natural-resources role after concluding the combined position was too broad for one person. The RFP sought contractors that could provide preparedness planning, hazard mitigation coordination, incident support (including documentation necessary for potential grant or reimbursement processes), and public outreach.
Who was interviewed The board conducted interviews with three respondents to the RFP (information on each firm was provided to commissioners in advance): - TKG Consulting LLC (representative: Dan, candidate in meeting) - 14 Courageous Leadership LLC (representative on the Web meeting) - A third candidate (Patrick Myers) scheduled for a subsequent interview.
Candidate presentations Each presenter outlined relevant qualifications including multi-hazard planning, experience writing and maintaining Emergency Operations Plans (EOPs), hazard mitigation plan updates, and experience serving as operations or safety officer on incident management teams. Candidates described tasks they would perform if contracted: assess current county EOP and appendices, identify gaps, shepherd an update through the state EOP review tool, support a FEMA-compatible hazard mitigation plan update, lead or assist tactical exercises, and provide on-site incident support during larger events.
Board questions and next steps Commissioners asked about candidate availability during multi-day incidents, travel and per-event charges, how candidates would avoid conflicts when they take national incident assignments, and whether candidates can help secure EMPG or similar grants. Several candidates said they maintain incident-management qualifications and occasionally serve on national teams but that they prioritize county contract obligations and would return to local duties if the county faced an emergency. Commissioners made clear the emergency manager role would report directly to the Board of County Commissioners; staff will provide administrative support but not line control.
Timeline The board held two interviews Feb. 11 and scheduled the final interview Feb. 20. Commissioners said they expect to reach a decision after all interviews and will aim to begin a county engagement as soon as contract details and any necessary budgeting and grant reviews are completed.
Why it matters County reviewers said the contract is intended to increase local preparedness, get the county back in compliance with state hazard-mitigation and EOP review requirements, and to provide consistent documentation and claim support during multi-agency events. Commissioners emphasized the importance of local knowledge and the ability to show cost and resource tracking during major incidents.
