Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works Roads topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winnebago County weighs contracting roadside weed and brush control to cut $32,500 from proposed budget
Summary
County staff presented two contractor bids for countywide roadside weed/brush control; supervisors discussed targeting worst roads, a one-year pilot, and agreed on a budget target to fund contracting.
Winnebago County supervisors reviewed bids to contract roadside weed and brush control and discussed reallocating roughly $32,500 from existing roadside budget lines to fund a contract for part or all of the county.
Scott Meinders, county engineer, presented two bids for a proposed countywide roadside management contract covering weed spraying, brush control and related work. One bid included chemicals and totaled about $71,855; the other omitted chemicals and was lower but would require the county to supply herbicide. Meinders told the board that if the county contracted out the work, the department could potentially reduce next year’s proposed roadside budget by about $32,500 without reducing full-time staff levels. "If we contracted, we could cut about $32,000 out of the proposed budget for next year," Meinders said.
Supervisors discussed options to reduce scope (for example, contracting only half the miles or focusing on hotspots) and to request bidders re-price based on a fixed county dollar amount or a specified number of miles. Commissioners flagged operational considerations including brush removal (hauling vs. chipping), chemical selection and continuity between years. The board also discussed delivering a map of planned spray/brush areas as a contractor accountability measure.
Budget line changes described in the session included proposed reallocations from chemicals, fuels, vehicle maintenance and seasonal help; Meinders presented detail showing savings assumptions drawn from those lines. Board members discussed running a one-year contract as a pilot and obtaining contractor maps and schedules before renewal. There was no final formal vote on contracting during the meeting; instead, supervisors directed staff to seek refined bids and to ask contractors how many miles they could cover for specified dollar amounts.
The board agreed to pursue a phased approach if necessary (targeting worst roads first) and indicated a preference for a one-year contract to confirm performance before committing to multi-year agreements. Supervisors asked staff to solicit updated bids that reflect a county budget target and to report back with maps and a recommended contract length.
