Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Schedule Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board opens study of swapping elementary and high-school start times; forms task force for stakeholder review
Summary
Board members discussed a proposal to swap elementary and high-school start times (later high-school start) to align with adolescent sleep research; staff cautioned that transportation, CTE, athletics and tenant schedules require detailed analysis and recommended surveys and a cross-functional task force before any decision.
Board members discussed an exploratory proposal to swap elementary and high-school start times — shifting high schools later and elementary schools earlier — after trustees and staff reviewed research suggesting later start times can improve adolescent health, attendance and academic performance.
The superintendent and board members said examples exist in other jurisdictions such as Wake County (NC) and Anne Arundel County (MD) and noted benefits cited in the research: improved attendance, better student alertness and potential academic gains. Several board members emphasized the need for broad stakeholder engagement before any change: teachers, parents, student representatives, athletics and community partners would all be affected. A student member told the board a later high-school start would likely improve sleep and daytime functioning for many students.
Operations staff cautioned that transportation logistics — number of bus tiers, special-education routes, regional programs and afterschool activities — could require schedule redesign and might have fiscal consequences. Kathy Mendez (assistant superintendent for operations) told the board she could not say the change would be budget neutral and recommended a careful analysis to determine routing, potential additional buses, impacts on regional programs and services for students experiencing homelessness.
Board members asked staff to convene a cross-functional team (a “tiger team”) to analyze feasibility, timeline and cost; members stressed the need for a communications plan and community surveys to gauge public support. Several trustees suggested a phased timeline with at least six-to-nine months of lead time to allow families and community partners to adapt if the board elects to proceed.
Ending: The board agreed to form a task force to explore the proposal, perform routing and fiscal analysis, and conduct stakeholder outreach; staff will return with findings and recommended next steps for the board’s consideration.
