Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Cannabis topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge pause, raise safety and economic concerns about proposed cannabis storefronts
Summary
Multiple public speakers urged the council to pause the commercial cannabis storefront permitting process, citing public-health, pesticide concerns, industry instability and the effect on Artesia Boulevard’s beautification plans.
Several members of the public used the council’s public comment period to press the City Council to slow or pause consideration of commercial cannabis storefronts while broader concerns are resolved.
Marie Puterbaugh and Brad Waller, two speakers who identified themselves as District residents and as candidates or potential candidates for local office, urged caution. Waller said the cannabis industry’s financial instability, tax-collection issues and an LA Times investigation into pesticide use in cannabis products were reasons to pause the ordinance process until after the upcoming election. Puterbaugh raised concerns about a specific candidate for council (identified by name in her remarks) and urged the city to consider allegations she says are in public records when evaluating candidates and public trust.
Georgia Ganter, who identified herself as a candidate for mayor and a District 2 resident, described community concerns about dispensaries near Artesia Boulevard and suggested locating dispensaries near medical centers and limiting hours to facilitate regulation and security. Ganter said Artesia has a concentration of retail uses—including smoke shops, liquor stores and massage parlors—and urged the council to consider neighborhood character and the Boulevard’s upcoming beautification budget (she referenced a $450,000 figure that could rise to $1 million depending on available funds) when permitting dispensaries.
Rick McQuillan, representing an Artesia Boulevard business group, described a volunteer business-development plan for the corridor and urged coordinated economic development to attract a more diverse mix of retailers; he noted existing vacancy and the presence of multiple retail categories on Artesia.
The comments reflect an active local debate; the council did not take any immediate action on the cannabis ordinance during the meeting. Several speakers asked that the council delay action until the next elected council and mayor are in place or until further study addresses public-health and economic stability concerns.
