Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission approves 27-unit Anderson Development townhome project with facade and parking conditions

2292362 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After an extended public hearing with multiple neighborhood speakers raising traffic, parking and environmental concerns, the planning commission approved a small-scale master plan and preliminary subdivision for a 27-unit townhome development at 6766 South 300 East with conditions requiring enhanced masonry on several public-facing units.

The Midvale City Planning Commission approved a small-scale master plan and a preliminary subdivision allowing individual ownership of a proposed 27-unit townhome development at 6766 South 300 East, granting incentives for reduced setbacks and private-street design while adding conditions that several public-facing units meet the city’s facade masonry standards.

Staff introduced the Anderson Development LLC application as a small-scale master-plan request for 27 units on four existing parcels in the SF-1 duplex-overlay zone. Planners reported the proposal provides 18% improved common space (minimum requirement 15%) and 51% total open space (code minimum 50%). The applicant requested incentives available under the master-plan provisions to reduce interior setbacks (from 8 feet to 6 feet between buildings) and to permit a private street (the developer’s design shows a 41-foot-wide private road; 50 feet is required for a public right-of-way).

Architectural compliance was a focal point. The ordinance requires a minimum of 60% masonry-equivalent coverage on front facades and 40% on side facades. The developer’s elevations showed 83% masonry on fronts but only 23% on sides. The applicant sought a reduction for side facades while increasing the front masonry coverage. Commissioners and residents expressed concern about blank side walls visible from adjacent public streets and properties.

Neighbors raised a wide range of issues during the public hearing: on-street parking overflow, traffic speeds and safety on nearby residential streets (including requests to pursue traffic-calming measures), proximity of new units to existing backyards and garages, construction dust and concrete-washout handling, the location and operation of stormwater detention/sump areas, and the amount of on-site green space for children.

The developer, Adam Anderson of Anderson Development, and Brighton Homes representative Sean Poor described design choices intended to address those concerns: 2-car garages plus 20-foot driveways (reported as providing a total of 108 off-street parking stalls across the subdivision), a 41-foot private street to accommodate on-street parking without obstructing emergency access, low-impact development (LID) stormwater measures, a third-party SWPPP inspection program (Ascenta) for concrete washout and erosion control, and a 6-foot vinyl fence around the perimeter. The developer said he had an NOI permit and SWPPP materials under review.

After discussion, the commission approved the small-scale master plan and the preliminary subdivision. The motion approving the master-plan incentives granted a reduction to the cited municipal code section and approved incentives MMC 17.7.0.19 d (items 3 and 4) but required enhanced masonry (to meet current code) on the exterior-facing side facades of four identified corner lots (lots 1, 5, 11 and 15). The preliminary subdivision to create individual ownership of the 27 units was also approved; both votes passed on roll call (Chair Erickson — yes; Vice Chair Anderson — yes; Commissioner Snow — yes; Commissioner Lidke — yes; Commissioner Tippett — yes).

Commissioners and staff encouraged neighbors concerned about off-site traffic and speeding to pursue traffic-calming measures through the city’s traffic-control committee and to contact their council representative. Several commissioners indicated the facade condition could be enforced at final plan review rather than by granting a blanket variance.

Votes at a glance - Small-scale master plan (27-unit townhome, 6766 South 300 East) — Approved (5–0). Conditions: Units 1, 5, 11, 15 must meet side-facade masonry requirements; incentives granted per staff motion. - Preliminary subdivision (27 units at same address) — Approved (5–0).