Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pending Litigation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sacramento City Council holds closed session on Lennox lawsuit; no reportable action

2312623 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Sacramento City Council met in closed session Thursday to discuss pending litigation in Lennox v. City of Sacramento under Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1). The City Attorney reported there was nothing to report out.

The Sacramento City Council met in a special closed session Thursday, Feb. 13, to discuss pending litigation in Lennox v. City of Sacramento, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, under Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1). The City Attorney reported there was "nothing to report out at this time."

Mayor (unnamed) called the special meeting to order and the City Clerk (unnamed) confirmed a quorum and said no members of the public had signed up to speak. The clerk identified a single closed-session item: discussion of pending litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1). The case was named in the meeting transcript as Lennox v. City of Sacramento; the district court case number was not specified in the public record.

After meeting with legal counsel in closed session, the City Attorney (unnamed) told the council there was "nothing to report out at this time." The council then adjourned. No motions, votes or directions were reported during the session and no public deliberations were recorded on the public record.

Under state law, some closed-session discussions are confidential and public reporting is limited to reportable actions; the council provided no reportable action at this meeting.