Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Hotel Tax Funding Heritage Foundation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council discusses increasing hotel tax to fund heritage foundation; ballot timing, hotel study noted

2224980 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members discussed whether to raise the local hotel/motel tax (currently 5%) to match higher rates in larger cities and to fund a proposed Heritage Foundation; staff will complete a hotel study and council discussed placing a measure on the November ballot with an August deadline.

Council members discussed a possible ballot proposal to raise the local hotel/motel tax from the current 5 percent to a higher rate to help fund a proposed Heritage Foundation.

A council member noted that Le Mars’ current rate is 5 percent and compared it to Des Moines at 7 percent, asking whether the city should consider a similar increase and whether the tax would deter visitors. Another council member said the tax is mostly paid by out-of-town visitors and advocated placing any proposed increase on a November ballot so voters could decide.

Council members discussed timing: a staff comment indicated a 30- to 40-day lead time to place an item on a November ballot and recommended aiming for an August deadline to complete necessary paperwork. The council also noted a pending hotel study that staff said should be completed and would inform any final proposal on rates or ballot language.

Separately, a council member proposed establishing quarterly town-hall meetings; the council agreed staff would propose dates and return with a schedule. The meeting record does not show a formal vote to increase the hotel tax; it records council direction to pursue study and to return with options and timelines.

The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn that was seconded; council members approved by voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.