Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Title 11 Land Divisions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff reviews draft Title 11 rewrite; partitions and many subdivisions move to staff-level review under state rules
Summary
City planning staff presented a written draft rewrite of Title 11 (land divisions), proposing new standards for lots, private streets, access easements and a shift of many partitions and subdivisions to staff-level review under state limited land-use decision rules.
City planning staff presented a draft rewrite of Title 11 (land divisions), describing structural reorganization, new standards for private streets and access easements, reduced easement lengths, and a shift in many partition and subdivision reviews to a staff-level process consistent with state law.
The memorandum outlines seven chapters covering purpose, applicability, lot and street standards, property boundary adjustments, partitions, subdivisions and application material. Key staff recommendations presented to the Planning Commission included: retaining Title 11 separate from Title 10 for now, updating lot design standards (40-foot frontage, 25-foot cul-de-sac bulb), clarifying private street versus private access easement standards, limiting access easements to 200 feet (reduced from 300), allowing applicants two years to record a final plat (rather than one), and treating many partitions and subdivisions as “limited land use decisions” with clear and objective standards that make them staff-reviewable under state law.
"This change is to make the title 11 consistent with the requirements of state law," staff said, referring to provisions that render clear-and-objective land-use decisions subject to staff-level review. Staff explained that applicants may still choose to have the planning commission hear an application directly rather than start at staff level, and that any staff decision remains appealable to the planning commission and then to the city council.
The draft also includes standards for private streets (built and maintained by owners) and private access easements (intended to serve one or two lots), and requires turnarounds and fire-district-acceptable access if easements exceed specified lengths. Staff outlined new phrasing to prevent "serial partitions" that would otherwise create a subdivision without appropriate review. ORS chapter 92 was cited as the state statute that sets a 10-year limit for recording all phases of a subdivision once phased approvals begin; staff proposed a two-year recording window for the initial plat consistent with local practice and state guidance.
Commissioners raised notice concerns: state rules permit staff-level review with 300-foot mailed notice for some actions, which in a small community may not reach residents who have interest in infrastructure impacts (water, sewer, schools). Staff recommended additional local measures: posting the property per city specifications, listing new applications on the city website, and adding a monthly staff-action list to the planning commission packet so commissioners and the public can see pending staff-level decisions.
Staff also noted that variance requests would trigger planning commission review rather than a staff decision because variances introduce discretion.
Ending: Staff will bring page-by-page revisions back to the commission next month and will include recommended posting language (property posting and website notice) and options for applicant-initiated planning commission hearings for subdivisions to preserve visibility and public input in the small-city context.
