Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage Flood Recovery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County engineer raises concerns about paperwork burden for small disaster reimbursements; DNR outlet repairs discussed
Summary
Worth County officials debated whether pursuing federal or state reimbursement for small flood-related road repairs is worth staff time, and discussed a drainage outlet on DNR property that landowners say needs work; county and residents weighed cost-sharing and repair options.
A county official raised concerns that pursuing federal or state reimbursement for small flood events imposes heavy documentation requirements that may outweigh the financial benefit for Worth County.
"I hate to, like, turn down any chance of getting federal funding, but my goodness. It takes us a long time to get $50,000," the county engineer said, describing the paperwork and measurement demands required to obtain reimbursement for rock and road repairs after washouts. "It's more time than money. The documentation process is getting worse."
The engineer said federal or state programs now require detailed measurements — length, width and depth of washouts and rock placed — which county public works crews do not routinely record when reopening roads. That administrative burden, the official said, can make small-event claims impractical and could divert staff time from other maintenance needs.
The discussion shifted to a local drainage outlet that sits on state-managed land. County and landowners reported that the outlet had been unavailable for decades and that tiling, rerouting or rock bedding would be needed to restore proper flow. The county engineer described options suggested by staff to reroute tile away from sandy ditch bottoms to reduce bedding needs and avoid a slushy repair.
County officials and landowners discussed cost-sharing: the engineer said if the state (DNR) expects the county or drainage district to fill in or reconstruct an outlet to meet DNR requirements, the state should help fund a substantial portion of the work. "If you want us to fill that back in, and I think the board will agree with you, you're gonna have to cough up the money, at least a good portion of it," the engineer said.
County staff and landowners also discussed routine vegetation control as a preventive measure; mowing the area around tile outlets was suggested to reduce long-term blockages. One landowner noted potential crop damage claims after heavy rains in the prior season.
The county did not adopt a formal motion on funding at the meeting; officials said they would seek further clarification from the state and from DNR representatives about whether the DNR could or would provide funds or allow the county to maintain the outlet in place.
