Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cole County approves nonexclusive license for Google Fiber to place network facilities in county right of way
Summary
The county approved a nonexclusive license agreement with Google Fiber Missouri LLC allowing fiber installations in public right of way, with insurance and a performance bond requirements and staff noting the agreement gives county authority to require repairs or relocation at the utility's expense.
Cole County commissioners approved a nonexclusive license agreement with Google Fiber Missouri LLC on Tuesday that authorizes the company to install network facilities in county public right of way.
Public Works staff explained the agreement allows Google Fiber to place facilities in the countys right of way in exchange for conditions intended to protect the county and property owners, including a requirement that Google carry general liability insurance of $2,000,000 and a performance bond of $5,000 for the term of the agreement. The staff member said the bond requirement covers the entirety of the agreement to provide a remedy if work is not corrected to the countys or property-owners satisfaction.
Commissioners asked whether fiber deployments tend to allow later access by other providers or whether successive trenches and restorations create repeated disruption. Public Works staff said market forces and density typically mean residential corridors host a single major provider while denser corridors can have multiple utilities. The staff member noted that the license allows the county to require utilities to remove or relocate facilities at the utilitys expense if necessary for a county project.
A commissioner moved to approve and sign the Google Fiber license agreement for public works. The motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.
Why this matters: the agreement governs how a large private carrier will install fiber in county rights of way, sets insurance and bonding minimums, and gives the county mechanisms to enforce restoration or relocation obligations. The county indicated it will consider similar agreements for other utilities moving forward.
Details: the transcript shows the insurance requirement as $2,000,000 general liability and a $5,000 performance bond; the public discussion referenced ongoing complaints in some areas where out-of-town contractors did not properly restore yards and noted the bond would provide leverage to ensure remediation.
