Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works Branding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pender County declines to approve new Tops tank logo; painting will proceed under maintenance contract

2171699 · January 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board took no action on a proposal to update the Tops elevated water tank logo after a motion to adopt the county seal design failed for lack of a second; painting of the tank remains scheduled under a maintenance contract and logo options could return to the board.

Pender County commissioners considered four logo designs and associated costs to refresh the Tops elevated water tank but took no action after a motion to adopt one option failed for lack of a second.

Brian Terry, the county's water and sewer superintendent, said routine painting of the tank is covered by a 10-year maintenance contract signed in 2023 and is scheduled as part of the vendor's rotation. The board was being asked only to authorize additional funds to add a new logo or artwork to the tower exterior; staff presented four recommended options with costs ranging from $28,000 to $32,782.

Option 1 (turtle with "Pender County") was listed at $30,250; Option 3 (turtle with "Tops") at $28,000; Option 5 (county seal with "Pender County") at $32,782; and Option 6 (county seal with "Tops") at $31,729. Terry said the extra cost is for complexity, colors and lettering, and that painting of the tower will take place regardless of a logo decision.

Commissioners asked whether the money would come from general taxes; staff explained the expense would come from the utility enterprise fund and not the property-tax levy. Several commissioners said they supported a standardized county seal but one commissioner said the cost was an unnecessary luxury and would not support spending that level of funds even from the enterprise fund. A motion to approve Option 5 was made but died for lack of a second, and no alternate motion passed; the board took no action. The tower will be repainted per the maintenance contract with existing exterior color and logo unless a future board authorizes a new design.

What happens next: painting under the maintenance contract will proceed; staff indicated the logo question could be brought back for future action if the board chooses to appropriate enterprise funds for a new design.