Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Ticketing appellate special master hears multiple Miami code-enforcement cases; several reset or marked no-show
Loading...
Summary
At the Feb. 20, 2025 Ticketing Appellate Special Master hearing in Miami, staff recorded multiple code-enforcement cases as no-shows or resets; an inspector reported at least one paid/complied case and one page on the docket was noted as settled.
The Ticketing Appellate Special Master convened hearings in Miami on Feb. 20, 2025, to review a docket of code-enforcement ticket appeals. Staff recorded multiple cases as no-shows or as reset for later hearing; an inspector confirmed at least one case had been paid and one docket entry was noted as settled.
The session covered several dozen docket entries, with staff calling case numbers and property addresses. Several cases were explicitly recorded as “no show” when the listed respondents did not appear, including case numbers 82000, 93090, 93693613, 94944, 94923, 94952, 95644 and 95074. Staff also recorded multiple resets — meaning the hearing was rescheduled — including case numbers 95587, 95432 and 96161. One docket entry on page 81 was described in the hearing as settled.
A staff member told the panel that an inspector had informed them a case on the docket had been paid and was complied with; the transcript did not tie that statement to a specific case number. In one instance staff recommended resetting a case because the first notice and second notice had an address issue; the panel agreed to reset that matter.
Staff read property addresses alongside case numbers during the session; examples included 3240 Northwest Eleventh Avenue (case 95587), 2028 Northwest 20 Sixth Street (case 82000), 5810 North Miami Avenue (case 93090), 695 Northeast Eightieth Street (case 94944), 835 Northwest 20 Sixth Avenue (case 94923), 40 Northwest 60 Fifth Street (case 94952), 7695 Northeast Eighth Avenue (case 95644), and 3420 Northwest Sixteenth Street (case 95074).
The hearing concluded after staff finished calling the listed docket entries. The transcript does not record formal motions, recorded votes, or additional directions to staff beyond resetting specified matters and noting no-shows or compliances.
Because the record ties outcomes to docket numbers and page references rather than detailed findings in the transcript, the article lists only what staff stated on the record: which cases were called and whether they were labeled a no-show, reset, settled or complied/paid. Where the transcript did not explicitly link a payment or settlement to a specific case number, the article indicates that detail as not specified in the record.
