Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Palm Springs council reviews library naming-rights plan; foundation aims for $7 million campaign

6489595 · September 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff and the Palm Springs Public Library Foundation outlined naming-rights tiers and pledge options for the library renovation; naming rights above $100,000 require council approval and the foundation hopes to raise roughly $7 million (about $2M for building enhancements; $5M for an endowment).

Library Director Jeannie Case and Bill Wiley, president of the Palm Springs Public Library Foundation, presented proposed naming-rights categories tied to the library renovation during the Sept. 25 council meeting.

Jeannie said a city-library memorandum of understanding requires council approval for naming opportunities that exceed $100,000; the foundation is in a private (“quiet”) fundraising phase and anticipates a public campaign in the next few months. Wiley said the foundation is prepared to accept multi-year pledges and worked through pledge-card mechanics with donors.

Wiley outlined the foundation’s broad fundraising target and priorities: roughly $2,000,000 earmarked for enhancements to the renovation plan and $5,000,000 to seed an endowment to support the library over multiple decades. He said the $100,001-and-up tier is proposed as a 20-year naming term intended to reflect a “generational gift.” Jeannie and Wiley said the foundation will use a digital honor wall rather than engraved bricks to recognize donors.

Council members asked for assurances about vetting donors whose names might appear on the building and asked that council be notified of donations in the $25,000–$100,000 range; the city manager said staff would notify council members about significant gifts.

The item was presented as part of the consent calendar and was included in the motion to accept the consent calendar with listed pulls and abstentions; the council took no separate action during discussion beyond confirming the naming-rights framework.