Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears preliminary budget showing $2.3M gap; approves consent items 5‑0
Summary
District administrators presented a preliminary three‑year budget forecast showing a projected $2.3 million gap and a next‑year projection of about $82 million; the board approved consent new‑business personnel and financial items by a 5‑0 vote.
Get email alerts on the District Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Laura (staff member) presented the district’s initial budget assumptions and a multi‑year forecast, saying early figures are estimates and will be refined as state aid and other data become available.
"Our first dive in budget development are a lot of estimates of estimates of estimates. I don't know that there's 1 number in here that's concrete," Laura said, describing a planning process over the next six to eight weeks that will refine building and department requests and incorporate state revenue figures.
Key figures presented: the district’s current operating budget baseline was described in the meeting around $78.7–$78.8 million. Staff projected next‑year expenditures near $82.0 million, an increase of about $3.3 million (approximately 4.25%), and reported a current-year projected revenue increase of about $1.0 million (1.32%) under conservative assumptions with no state‑aid increase. The presentation identified a preliminary budget gap of roughly $2.3 million; staff proposed appropriating $1.0 million of fund balance to offset part of that gap and said they are awaiting state aid figures and a governor’s executive budget to refine projections.
Revenue assumptions: the presenters used last year’s CPI and tax base growth in preliminary calculations and estimated a tax‑cap increase near 2.3% under those assumptions. Miscellaneous revenues were expected to increase by approximately $133,000, primarily from health‑insurance rebates; interest earnings were budgeted more conservatively at about $300,000 (a reduction from recent higher receipts).
Expense assumptions: contractual obligations for groups in negotiation were estimated at about $1.35 million. The presentation flagged a $2,000,000 contingency line (with $1,000,000 offset by fund balance), a $100,000 capital outlay line, projected increases in special education placements and private‑tuition costs, and an estimated 8% increase in transportation costs. Staff said ERS (New York State Employees’ Retirement System) rates were under review and cited a projected 16.5% rate as an example for planning.
On motions and votes, the board moved to approve "item D, consent of new business personnel and financial items." A motion was made and seconded; the board approved the consent items by voice vote, "Aye," and the clerk recorded the motion as carrying 5‑0.
Votes at a glance: • Approve item D — consent of new business personnel and financial items: approved 5‑0 (mover and seconder not specified in the transcript).
Next steps: staff will continue administrator meetings to refine building and department requests, wait for state aid and the executive budget, and provide another budget update in February with more detailed revenue projections and staffing/breakage adjustments.

