Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Chaplains topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves bill allowing schools to hire or allow volunteer chaplains subject to local policies and background checks

3097862 · February 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 164, which would permit local public and open-enrollment charter schools to hire or allow volunteer chaplains under locally determined criteria and background checks, passed the Senate Education Committee on a voice vote.

The Senate Education Committee voted to pass Senate Bill 164, which would permit local public school districts and open-enrollment charter schools to hire employees or allow volunteer chaplains if local boards choose to do so.

Senator Dodson, sponsor of the bill, described it as "fairly simplistic" and said the bill "allows the option" for schools to hire chaplains or permit volunteer chaplains; it does not require districts to do so. Dodson said the measure lays out a framework for eligibility criteria and background checks for anyone serving in that role.

The bill leaves hiring policies, volunteer criteria and supervision to local districts and charters. Dodson emphasized that schools would need to create their own hiring or volunteer criteria and that the bill establishes baseline procedural and safety checks, including background checks for those who would serve as chaplains.

No witnesses appeared in opposition during the committee hearing. Senator Dodson moved that the committee "do pass" the bill; a second was recorded and the committee approved SB164 by voice vote. The chair closed the matter with "All opposed? Thank you. Pass your bill." The committee then adjourned.

Senators voiced general support for the measure in committee; supporters characterized the bill as providing an option for districts and charters rather than imposing a statewide requirement. The record contains no reported amendments or fiscal impacts discussed during the hearing.