Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pedestrian Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board tables crosswalk pavement markings and flashing-signal proposals for Canal/Intermediate after engineers' estimates requested

2173697 · January 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board reviewed proposals for pavement-marked crosswalks and solar flashing pedestrian signs at Canal Road and Intermediate Avenue near the middle/high school and tabled action while administration seeks combined engineering and installation quotes, plus a not-to-exceed cap.

The board discussed a multi-option proposal to improve pedestrian safety near Dover Area Middle and High Schools, including repainting four crosswalks (a “piano-key” thermoplastic style) and installing solar-powered flashing pedestrian signs at the Canal Road/Intermediate Avenue intersection. The pavement-marking vendor (D.E. Gemmell, as stated in the proposal) quoted crosswalk painting and permanent in-road signs; engineering proposals to site flashing devices were provided by ELA (the district's civil engineer).

Details presented - Pavement markings: a proposal for four renewed/repainted crosswalks was shown; the board and administration discussed whether to include an additional crosswalk in front of the high school (engineer review required). - Flashing, solar-powered pedestrian signs: engineering-only proposals were $2,800 for a single set (one intersection) and $4,200 for two sets (two intersections); the equipment is separate (estimated at about $3,500 per sign, installed, and $492 for permanent in-road reflective markers). The flashing sign units require two signs per crossing (one for each direction) because signs must face oncoming traffic. - Installation and permitting: engineering proposals included permit coordination, but board members asked administration to clarify permit responsibility, traffic-control scope and any mobilization fees (the vendor noted a mobilization fee if crews remobilize). The township had reduced the speed limit to 25 mph on the stretch, which enables the use of in-road mounted pedestrian signs.

Board action The board tabled items 6.01 (pavement markings) and 6.02/6.03 (engineering for one or two sets of flashing signs) and asked administration to: (a) request a combined quote for pavement markings, engineering and sign procurement/installation with a clear not-to-exceed cap and (b) obtain at least two additional installation bids to compare costs. A straw poll at the meeting showed board interest in prioritizing a single set of flashing signs at Canal/Intermediate and pursuing engineering for an additional high-school crosswalk, but the formal vote was to table while the administration assembles more complete quotes.

Direct quotes - On mobilization: the vendor's proposal said a second mobilization could carry a fee (the document listed $950 as a mobilization figure in one line item). - On safety and location: administration noted that the township and ELA had reviewed the site and that the speed limit needed to be 25 mph to allow in-road signage.

Ending Administration will return with a single, combined engineering/purchase/installation proposal, a not-to-exceed cap, permit cost estimates and two additional installation bids for the board to consider.