Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections Bond Referenda topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves 25% turnout threshold for off‑year local bond elections, removes 12‑month lockout

2380626 · February 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers advanced House Bill 79 to require at least 25% voter participation (plus one) of the most recent general-election turnout for a political subdivision before an off‑year bond election can be approved, and the committee removed a 12‑month lockout for reoffering a proposal.

Representative Skylar Stivar introduced House Bill 79 to add a voter-participation threshold for bond elections held on days other than a general election. The engrossed proposal requires that, for such off‑year bond questions to be approved, a majority of ballots cast must favor the proposal and the total ballots cast must equal at least 25% plus one of the number of qualified electors who voted in the political subdivision in the immediately preceding general election.

Secretary of State Chuck Gray testified in favor, citing low turnout examples and urging broader voter participation for large financial decisions. Gray noted the 2023 Laramie County Fire Authority bond election that had only 347 votes cast out of 7,173 registered voters (4.84% turnout); he said the bill would have required far more participation for approval. "Off year bond elections often have very low turnout," Gray told the committee, and a modest participation floor ensures "tax and spending decisions are made with broader voter input."

Opponents urged caution. Gail Simmons, a longtime elections advocate, said a participation threshold is a blunt instrument that could punish communities for low turnout and argued for incentives that increase participation rather than a statutory floor. County clerks noted administrative timelines and ballot-formation deadlines that require clarifying language if the measure moves forward.

Committee members debated refinements. Sponsors accepted an amendment removing a 12‑month lockout on reoffering a question when a proposal fails due to insufficient turnout; the committee directed staff to clarify timing and notification procedures with clerks. Another staff amendment changed language from "requiring" to "authorizing" where appropriate.

The committee adopted the amendment package and proceeded to a roll-call vote. The committee recorded a majority in favor and advanced the bill (recorded ayes from several committee members; the clerk and secretary of state assisted with technical drafting suggestions during the working session).

Votes and amendments: HB 79 — Committee action: advanced with amendments. The committee removed a 12‑month lockout clause (allowing a failed special-election proposition to move to the next general election or be rescheduled under normal timelines), and clarified the statutory wording to refer to authorization rather than a mandatory requirement in one instance.

Why it matters: The bill changes how and when local governments can obtain voter approval for bonds outside general elections. Sponsors described it as a guard against small-turnout, high-cost decisions; critics said it could block needed local projects and urged alternatives that boost participation.

Where it stands: The committee voted to advance HB 79 with the amendments; interested parties (county clerks, secretary of state) sought conforming drafting language for timelines and notices before the bill reaches the floor.