Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Water Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

CFS Engineering: low bid for U.S. 75 turn-lane project; water-study scope may need $38,000 supplementary funding

2627713 · January 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CFS Engineering reported a low apparent bid of $1,749,574.49 for the U.S. 75 turn-lane cost-share project and updated the commission on a regional water study that may require an additional ~$38,000 to complete modeling and district data integration.

CFS Engineering briefed the commission on two separate infrastructure items: bids received on a cost-share turn-lane project on U.S. 75 and the status of a county regional water study.

Bids: Three bids were opened for the turn-lane project. The engineer’s estimate was $1,981,315.85. The apparent low bid was $1,749,574.49 from a company referred to in the transcript as “Kilo” (apparent low bidder). Two higher bids were received from APAC ($2,244,122.75) and Bettis ($2,519,872.54). CFS said the bids included the required documentation and the firm will perform the usual checks and return a recommendation to the commission for formal contract award.

Water study: The engineering firm provided an update on the county water-study work. Staff reported they had collected data from Coffee District 3 and updated the existing-conditions model; they were awaiting water-use data from other districts. CFS noted that part of the regional work — additional modeling and integration for Wholesale 12’s network and Midwest Engineers’ contributions connected to the KSMC site — was not fully included in the original contract price. The firm estimated roughly $38,000 of additional work would be required to complete the county-wide analysis. CFS said the additional work could be contracted directly with the district (Wholesale 12) or routed through CFS; the county will review whether the supplemental expense should come from capital-improvement funds or another account.

Why it matters: The turn-lane project affects county traffic safety and access along a state route; awarding the construction contract will set a schedule and cost for the county’s share. The water study informs long-term water-system planning and any grant applications tied to regional improvements; incomplete modeling could delay final recommendations and grant applications.

Next steps: CFS will complete bid checks and bring a formal recommendation on the apparent low bidder for the turn-lane project. For the water study, CFS will prepare a written supplement or contract amendment and return to the commission with proposed funding and procurement steps; commissioners asked staff to review possible budget sources.