Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Grants And Sites topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historical Commission outlines grants, state‑site projects and marker maintenance needs
Summary
The Tennessee Historical Commission described matching grants, a new historic property acquisition fund, ongoing state historic‑site capital projects and marker upkeep; the agency said it awarded 23 grants from a competitive land/acquisition fund and oversees 17 state historic sites with capital projects underway.
Patrick McIntyre, executive director and State Historic Preservation Officer, briefed the Finance, Ways and Means Committee on the Tennessee Historical Commission’s programs, grant activity and capital work at state historic sites.
McIntyre said the commission administers federal and state preservation programs, oversees the state historic marker program (about 2,000 markers statewide), and supports rehabilitation tax‑credit projects that have generated roughly $1.5 billion in private investment in previously rehabilitated properties. He described a new historic property land acquisition fund that received strong demand: the program awarded 23 grants in its initial round from roughly $2 million in available funds and about $6 million in requests.
McIntyre summarized capital projects under commission oversight: two visitor‑center projects — the Rock Castle visitor center (roughly $11 million) and a Carter House visitor center in Franklin (roughly $6.5 million) — and other site improvements under development. He said the commission administers federal matching grants (Historic Preservation Fund) and a civil war site preservation program that has conserved acreage in high‑pressure development areas.
The commission asked for capital funding for three state sites (Ducktown/Burra Mine, Marble Springs and Alex Haley’s boyhood home in Henning) but said those requests were not funded in the current cycle. McIntyre said the marker maintenance program receives a small annual allocation (about $45,000) used for repairs and replacements and that the agency relies on public reports to identify markers in need of attention.
Committee members asked about application counts, matching requirements and the commission agreed to provide members with additional detail about grants and any recent projects in specific counties on request.
No formal votes were taken during the presentation.
