Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Service Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee recommends CDBG and CICT awards to local service providers; motion passes unanimously

2626715 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee voted unanimously to recommend allocations of CICT and CDBG funds to nine service providers and to place remaining CICT funds into a previously established contingency for an affordable housing development.

The Affordable Housing Advisory Committee voted unanimously to recommend a set of Community Investment and Community Trust (CICT) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) awards to local service providers and to allocate remaining CICT funds to a previously established contingency for the Home First development.

Committee members approved the allocations in a single motion moved by Mandy Dalrymple and seconded by Isabel (Isabelle) Milkovich. The motion lists specific award amounts for both CICT and CDBG requests and includes a contingency for any future increases or decreases in CDBG funding to be distributed evenly across awarded CDBG recipients.

The recommendation covers CICT awards to Ben Church ($10,000), Bethlehem Inn ($82,400), Thrive Central Oregon ($223,687), J Bar J Youth Services / The Loft ($25,000), Home More Network ($12,500), and directs the remaining available CICT funds ($7,913) to the Home First development contingency established in December. CDBG awards recommended were Volunteers in Medicine ($40,000), Thrive Central Oregon ($30,000) and Saving Grace ($25,000). Committee members explained that some applicants are eligible for both funding sources and that awards may be a combination of CICT and CDBG when eligible.

The award motion included an explicit contingency instruction: any reduction in CDBG funding would be distributed evenly across the awarded CDBG recipients; likewise any increase in CDBG funds would be distributed evenly across those awardees. Committee members also agreed that any remaining CICT funds should go to a previously identified contingency award tied to Home First development. Committee Chair Richard Rees and members Lisonbee Hoingarden, Isabel Milkovich, Heather Simmons, Mandy Dalrymple and Helen Silfen voted in favor; the motion carried unanimously.

Committee staff reminded members that CDBG funds must be spent by June 30, 2026, and that timeliness is a HUD requirement; the city was previously found untimely in June 2023 but remains compliant at present. Staff also noted differences between exported spreadsheets and the on-screen allocation spreadsheet; the on-screen spreadsheet was identified as the accurate allocation record.

The committee’s decision will be forwarded to city council for final action on the dates provided by staff: affordable housing fund recommendations go to council on February 19, CICT recommendations on March 5, and CDBG recommendations after congressional appropriations allow drawing funds.

Votes at a glance Ben Church (CICT): $10,000 — recommended Bethlehem Inn (CICT): $82,400 — recommended Thrive Central Oregon (CICT): $223,687 — recommended J Bar J Youth Services / The Loft (CICT): $25,000 — recommended Home More Network (CICT): $12,500 — recommended (first-time applicant; reduced award) Home First development (CICT contingency): $7,913 — recommended (remaining funds to prior contingency) Volunteers in Medicine (CDBG): $40,000 — recommended Thrive Central Oregon (CDBG): $30,000 — recommended Saving Grace (CDBG): $25,000 — recommended

Staff clarified that some applicants had earlier federal awards (for example Home More Network previously received funds under a houseless services grant) and that newly awarded organizations unfamiliar with federal reporting can be funded at a reduced amount to allow a period of capacity building under city oversight. The committee directed staff to forward the recommended allocations and the motion’s contingency language to the city council.