Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Veto Override topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Massachusetts Senate overrides multiple gubernatorial vetoes, restoring funding for housing, education and social services
Summary
The Massachusetts Senate voted to override several of the governor's vetoes to restore funding in the FY26 general appropriation bill for programs including charter school reimbursements, shelter workforce supports, early intervention, low‑threshold housing, blind rehabilitation services and workforce/education programs.
Get email alerts on the Budget Veto Override topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Massachusetts Senate voted to override a series of gubernatorial vetoes on items in Section 2 of the FY26 general appropriation bill, restoring funding for a range of programs including charter school reimbursements, shelter workforce supports, early‑intervention services for young children, services for blind and visually impaired residents, low‑threshold housing for people with substance‑use and mental‑health disorders, and workforce and vocational training programs.
Senator Jo Comerford, the senator from Hampshire, argued repeatedly for the Senate to overturn the governor's reductions, saying the cuts would eliminate or sharply reduce supports for vulnerable populations. "This particular veto would eliminate earmarked funding for maximizing the independent living skills of legally blind residents," Comerford said, adding the funding supports "rehabilitation programs, housing assistance services, adjustment counseling services, and devices, software, and technology trainings for the blind." On the issue of housing, Comerford said: "This veto would reduce funding earmarked for low‑threshold housing for homeless individuals with substance use and mental health disorders at risk who are also at risk of HIV."
What the Senate did
Rather than debate each line item at length, the Senate proceeded through a sequence of roll calls on individual items. For each item introduced as coming "from the House" and reported as having been returned by the governor with a reduction or disapproval, the question put to the body was generally phrased as: "Shall the item pass, notwithstanding the objection of Her Excellency the Governor?" On the floor the Senate voted to pass each of the challenged items; the Senate clerk called roll for each item and the chair announced that the item "passes, notwithstanding the objection of Her Excellency the Governor," where applicable.
Votes at a glance (items mentioned in the session):
- Item 4110‑1000: Restores earmarked funding for services to blind and visually impaired residents (rehabilitation, housing assistance, counseling, assistive devices/training). Governor had reduced the item by $300,000; the Senate voted to override the reduction and pass the item (outcome: approved). Vote tally: not specified in the transcript block identifying the final roll call for this item.
- Item 4512‑200: Restores funding for low‑threshold housing programs for people with substance‑use and mental‑health disorders (described on the floor as funding for continued programming and expansion of low‑threshold housing units). Governor had reduced the item by $2,500,000; outcome: approved. Vote tally: not specified in the item block.
- Item 4513‑1020: Restores funding for the Early Intervention Program (services for infants and toddlers with or at risk for developmental delays). Governor had reduced the item by $1,530,735; outcome: approved. Vote tally: not specified in the item block.
- Item 7002‑1091: Restores funding intended to support vocational/technical schools to run third‑shift classes and programs for adult technical training (Governor had reduced by $250,000); outcome: approved. Vote tally: not specified in the item block.
- Item 7003‑0606: Restores state assistance to the Massachusetts Manufacturing Extension Partnership (referred to on the floor as MASMAP) that included an expected federal match; Senators described a total of $2,000,000 in state assistance and an additional $2,000,000 federal match that would be affected by the veto. The clerk later reported the roll call for this item as 36 in the affirmative and 2 in the negative; outcome: approved (36 yes, 2 no).
- Item 7004‑0109: Restores $5,000,000 aimed at supporting the Commonwealth's individual and family shelter workforce (transportation, loan repayment, tuition/certification reimbursements, child care for shelter employees); outcome: approved. Vote tally: not specified in the item block.
- Item 7004‑3036: Restores $500,000 for housing consumer education centers, which the sponsor described as providing information for tenants, property owners and prospective home buyers; outcome: approved. Vote tally: not specified in the item block.
- Item 7061‑9010: Restores approximately $19,898,807 for charter school reimbursement support (the sponsor said the veto would reduce reimbursements below 100% of the most recent enrollment projections); outcome: approved. Vote tally: not specified in the item block.
- Item 7007‑0150 and other items referenced on the floor: Restored funding for regional economic development grants (so‑called REDO grants), the proposed Tufts veterinary medicine program partnerships with community colleges and vocational technical schools, and additional appropriation line items described by sponsors as supporting manufacturing, training and regional economic development. Outcomes for these items were announced on the floor as approved; vote tallies for individual items were not specified in the item introduction blocks.
Procedure and next steps
Each item was introduced as "coming from the House" and reported as returned by the governor with either a reduction or disapproval; in each case the Senate moved to pass the item "notwithstanding the objection of Her Excellency the Governor." For most items, the clerk called the roll and the chair announced that two‑thirds of the members present had voted in the affirmative, after which the Senate reported "paper from the House." The session recessed after the sequence of roll calls.
What the record shows and what it does not
The transcript records sponsors' floor remarks (primarily Senator Jo Comerford) explaining programmatic effects of the vetoes and the subsequent roll calls. It does not include detailed legislative text of the underlying appropriations beyond the short item codes read on the floor, and many of the final roll call tallies were recorded in summary form in the transcript without linking a numeric tally to every individual item in the same nearby block of text; where the transcript does not explicitly provide a tally for an item that absence is noted above as "not specified."
