Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dog Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kanarraville adopts dog ordinance with set fines and three-warning process after debate
Summary
After extended debate about enforcement and equity, the Kanarraville Town Board voted to adopt a dog ordinance that sets behavioral fines at $150, a $300 fine for incidents causing harm, a three-warning process before fines, and authorizes Iron County Sheriff to impound animals for public safety.
The Kanarraville Town Board adopted a new dog ordinance on Feb. 13, 2025, after debate over fines, enforcement and whether the town or a board vote should impose penalties. The board approved a version that sets a $150 behavioral fine, a $300 fine for incidents that cause harm, and requires three warnings before fines are imposed. The Iron County Sheriff’s Department is authorized to impound dogs when necessary for public safety.
The ordinance was presented to the board as a response to repeated reports from residents of dogs running at large, menacing behavior and a few instances of people being bitten. The proposal removes language that would have required a separate town-board vote to impose fines; instead the ordinance sets fixed fine amounts and a warning structure. The board also agreed to strip language that gave the sheriff the authority to remove an animal only after a town-board vote and clarified that impoundment may occur when public safety is at risk.
Board members dividing over process and enforcement pushed several changes. Some members argued against discretionary, ad-hoc fines decided by the board, warning that the town could appear arbitrary and capricious. Others said a fixed fine schedule followed by opportunities for owners to plead their case strikes a practical balance. Councilors also noted that Kanarraville has no local code-enforcement staff and that effective enforcement will depend on cooperation with the Iron County Sheriff’s Office.
During discussion the board removed the phrases “may be imposed by vote of the town board” in two places in the draft ordinance and agreed to the three-warning approach before fines are assessed. The board also confirmed that fines are intended as deterrents, while acknowledging that owners who disregard rules are unlikely to pay and that the sheriff’s involvement will be necessary for enforcement.
The motion to adopt the ordinance (as modified at the meeting) was moved and seconded on the floor and carried on a roll-call vote of councilors present. Councilor Brandon Johnson, Councilor Jared Blackburn and Councilor Tony Sugar each answered in the affirmative during the roll call; other councilors present also voted yes.
The ordinance still requires codification in the town’s municipal code; the board directed staff to prepare the final ordinance language reflecting the deletions and the three-warning enforcement procedure and to place the finalized ordinance in the town record.
Board members said they expect to revisit enforcement details if the town encounters trouble collecting fines or if additional clarity is needed about the sheriff’s role. Several members recommended public education and a warning period after the ordinance is posted so residents understand new expectations for animals at large.
