Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sewanhaka board hears cell‑phone committee findings; committee recommends further study and stakeholder outreach
Summary
A district committee presented research linking student cell‑phone use to classroom disruption and mental‑health concerns and outlined next steps including student input Feb. 6, a parent forum and classroom education; no policy vote was taken.
The Sewanhaka Central High School District Board of Education on Jan. 28 heard an update from a newly formed cell‑phone committee that recommended further study, student and parent engagement, and classroom education before proposing any formal policy change.
District psychologists who led the committee said research and teacher reports indicated cell phones are interfering with instruction and student social and emotional development.
Dr. Jason Teague, school psychologist and co‑chair of the committee, told the board that the group — made up of teachers, administrators and clinicians from all five district high schools — examined research on learning, mental health and social skills and spoke with teachers about classroom impacts. "So I think, really, our consensus was that there are too many risks and too many harms at place," Teague said, summarizing the committee's judgment. He also cited polling and research the committee reviewed: "90% of NEA members support a school policy prohibiting cell phones or personal devices throughout the day," he said, referring to the National Education Association findings the committee discussed.
Nut graf: The committee did not propose a formal ban at the Jan. 28 meeting. Instead it outlined a staged approach designed to incorporate student and parent feedback and district education efforts before returning with recommendations.
The committee's immediate next steps are: gather student input at the superintendent's student leader workshop on Feb. 6; convene a parent forum (planned for March) to discuss research and hear concerns; and develop classroom lessons to educate students about phone use and social media effects. Dr. Carol Ores, district psychiatrist and co‑presenter, said the committee aims to report back to the board at the end of the school year with findings from student and parent engagement.
Presenters described several classroom concerns raised by teachers, including repeated disruptions, difficulty enforcing expectations, and incidents involving camera phones and bullying. "Almost all the teachers said that it was interfering with their teaching time in the classroom," Teague said.
Board response was supportive but noncommittal. The board president thanked the presenters and said the board stands ready to assist the committee; no motion or vote on a districtwide cell‑phone policy was taken at the meeting.
Ending: The committee plans to continue meeting through the school year and return to the board with summarized findings and any recommended policy language after stakeholder outreach and additional analysis.
