Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Icgis Data Integration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
ICGIS board reports progress toward criminal justice data integration; clerks working to close data gaps
Summary
Officials told the commission the Integrated Criminal Justice Information System (ICGIS) has multiple active projects to improve data transfer among clerks, courts, law enforcement and corrections, and that new legal requirements will require systems to meet minimum interoperability standards going forward.
Get email alerts on the Icgis Data Integration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission members received an update on the Integrated Criminal Justice Information System (ICGIS), a multi-agency effort to improve statewide criminal justice data sharing among district attorneys, sheriffs, chiefs of police, state police, courts, corrections and clerks.
Christopher Walters of the Governor’s Office said the ICGIS policy board has allocated $5 million for integration efforts and that multiple technical projects are underway to reduce disposition errors and improve the completeness of criminal records across agencies.
Why it matters: Commission members noted that policymakers and the public need reliable case data. Walters and clerks’ representatives said gaps exist where information is not captured or transmitted at each stage of a case (for example, between arresting agencies, district attorneys and clerks). ICGIS projects aim to build "bridges" between existing systems rather than force every partner onto a single platform.
Details from the update - Funding and partners: Walters said $5 million was allocated to ICGIS and that the policy board includes district attorneys, sheriffs, chiefs, state police, the Office of Juvenile Justice, the Department of Corrections, clerks, the judicial branch and the governor’s office.
- Ongoing projects: Walters described ongoing work on disposition error reports (to ensure disposed cases are recorded consistently by clerks and accepted by the Supreme Court), improved data sharing between clerks and the Department of Corrections for offender processing and time computations, and other integration work to make records consistent across the life of a case.
- Approach to interoperability: Walters said the board and legislature have taken steps so that, going forward, any entity purchasing or changing case-management systems must meet ICGIS minimum standards for data transferability. He characterized the effort as building translation "bridges" between systems now and requiring compatibility standards for new or replacement systems rather than attempting to put everyone on one monolithic system.
- Juvenile records: Walters and other speakers noted juvenile records require special handling; recent legislative changes permit authorized juvenile-court parties to access juvenile information in state police records in a segregated manner to support court decision-making while maintaining confidentiality protections.
Quotes on transparency and cooperation "The clerks are participating fully, and are working hard to bring all of their systems together and make those connections," Walters said. He added that gaps are attributable to several entities along the criminal justice road and that the board's work and recent legislative changes will help fix the problem going forward.
Ending Walters and commission members characterized ICGIS as a long-running, complex effort but said recent progress and legal changes make the near-term outlook positive. The commission did not take formal action on ICGIS during the meeting but heard it as part of the program updates.
