Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates proposed animal-code changes, including allowing chickens; members raise enforcement and cost concerns
Summary
Council members discussed a draft animal code that would change limits for backyard animals, including chickens. The conversation included concerns about enforcement resources, public health (avian influenza) and whether the issue diverts staff time from priorities such as affordable housing.
The Marysville City Council held an extended discussion about a draft animal code that would change local rules for backyard animals, including language that could allow chickens. No ordinance was adopted; council members agreed to continue work in committee and to await further input.
Council members and staff described the draft as broader than just chickens and said the change arose from questions about 4‑H projects and small-scale hobby farming. Some council members said the draft seeks to update acreage and animal-count language; others warned the debate expanded beyond the original 4‑H request.
Speakers raised enforcement concerns if the city adopts new allowances. Several council members said enforcing a new chicken provision would likely require hiring or reassigning staff, with one suggesting a combined code-enforcement and animal-control position funded by licensing fees (dog, cat, and potentially poultry licenses). Public comments cited trap-neuter-release efforts for feral cats and asked who would monitor avian flu risks; those public-safety and animal-health questions were noted by council members as matters for further study.
Council members also said the issue had prompted social-media debates and urged residents to attend meetings rather than rely on online commentary. At least one councilmember said the city should not let online "bullying" dominate policy choices and recommended a public hearing if the council decides to move the draft forward.
The council did not vote on the draft; members said staff and the administration finance committee would take the discussion up again and that the mayor's participation would be sought before any formal hearing or ordinance is scheduled.
