Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sea Level Rise Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Albany council approves letter backing multi‑jurisdiction East Bay shoreline planning proposal
Summary
Council voted to authorize a letter of support for a San Francisco Estuary Partnership grant proposal to fund an East Bay multi‑jurisdiction shoreline planning effort focusing on community engagement, vulnerability assessment and planning pathways for sea‑level rise adaptation.
The Albany City Council on Dec. 2 authorized a resolution supporting a grant application led by the San Francisco Estuary Partnership to fund multi‑jurisdictional shoreline planning on the East Bay Crescent, including Albany’s shoreline. The vote was unanimous among members present.
What the grant would fund: Caitlin Sweeney, director of the Estuary Partnership, told council the proposed two‑year planning project would focus on three items: a coordinated community and tribal engagement process, an existing‑conditions assessment and a shoreline exposure and vulnerability assessment. The work is intended to prepare jurisdictions for the next phase of developing sub‑regional shoreline adaptation plans required under recent state direction.
Why it matters: State legislation and guidance require local governments to prepare shoreline adaptation plans to respond to sea‑level rise. Sweeney said the State Ocean Protection Council funds are targeted for planning work; the partnership aims to apply for the planning track and to coordinate Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville and a portion of Oakland in a single multi‑jurisdictional effort to leverage limited local staff capacity.
Council comments: Council members thanked the partnership and city staff for pursuing the grant. One council member asked for clarification about the projected sea‑level‑rise scenarios and timelines in BCDC (the Bay Conservation and Development Commission) guidance documents; staff and the presenter said they would follow up on technical questions such as combined storm surge and sea‑level rise tallies. Council members expressed support for tribal and community engagement and emphasized the need to align the proposed planning geography with neighboring Contra Costa County efforts.
Council action: Councilmember (unnamed in transcript) moved to adopt a resolution authorizing a letter of support; the motion was seconded and passed by roll call vote. Councilmembers voting yes were recorded as Councilmember Hanson Romero, Councilmember Jordan, Vice Mayor Lopez and Mayor Mickey (Councilmember Tieterman was absent).
Ending: The Estuary Partnership said it will lead grant administration if awarded and coordinate technical consultants, with local staff participating in the working groups; staff said the partnership’s regional role can help smaller jurisdictions meet state planning timelines.
