Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety Rumble Strips topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council rejects rumble-strip plan for North Elliot and Clayton after debate over effectiveness and cost
Summary
The council discussed adding rumble strips and concrete road cuts at North Elliot Street and Clayton Road to address speed and safety concerns. After extended debate about alternatives and enforcement, the motion to install rumble strips and concrete pads failed.
The Pryor Creek City Council discussed a proposed safety project on North Elliot Street and Clayton Road on Feb. 10 that would add two 20-foot-by-10-foot concrete pads and rumble strips intended to alert drivers approaching a curve.
Buddy, the street department supervisor, told councilors the concrete work and grooves would cost roughly $30,000 to $32,000 for materials and in-house labor; he said a contractor had quoted about $3,500 to cut grooves (rumble strips). "We're gonna do the whole concrete," he said, describing plans to pour new concrete where the asphalt had lifted and add grooves ground into the surface.
Councilmembers and staff debated whether rumble strips are an effective traffic-calming measure in a neighborhood where many drivers are residents. Police Chief Cantrell and several council members questioned whether rumble strips would reduce speeds or merely alert drivers without producing sustained speed reduction. Cantrell and others recommended enforcement as a necessary complement. Council members also discussed stop signs and speed-limit reductions as lower-cost alternatives; several suggested trying a four-way stop or additional signage first.
After extended discussion the council voted on the rumble-strip installation and related concrete work. The motion to proceed with the rumble strips failed (motion defeated). Several council members who spoke against the measure argued that stop signs, lane markings, or enforcement would be cheaper or more effective. Supporters said the combination of concrete and grooves could provide an added safety cue at a known problem curve.
Why it matters: Residents had raised repeated safety concerns about vehicle speeds and collisions near the curve where North Elliot meets Clayton. The debate illustrates common municipal trade-offs among engineering, signage, and enforcement as tools to address localized safety issues.
What happens next: Council members asked staff to investigate alternatives including stop signs, additional signage, and potential speed-limit adjustments and to report back. Council also discussed checking whether installing stop signs requires a formal council vote or can be handled administratively "with the chief," and asked staff to return with cost estimates for alternatives.
At the meeting: the proposal came under the streets and public-safety discussion and prompted long debate among council members, public works staff and the police chief; the rumble-strip motion was defeated.
