Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Burns Harbor council opens review of noise ordinance after residents report industrial and truck noise
Summary
Council members discussed that current octave-band–based standards limit local enforcement, outside testing firms quoted thousands for single investigations, and shifting to decibel-based limits could make in-house enforcement more feasible.
Members of the Burns Harbor town council discussed changes to the town’s noise ordinance after multiple residential complaints about industrial equipment and heavy trucks, and raised concerns about the town’s ability to test and enforce current rules.
Council members said the town’s ordinance is written around octave-band measurements, which several people described as difficult and costly to test for enforcement. Participants described situations near industrial facilities and along State Road 149 where residents report persistent noise from exhaust fans and heavy trucks that they say can be audible inside homes.
The conversation focused on practical barriers to enforcement. Officials said private firms had quoted thousands of dollars for a single noise investigation — one figure of about $14,000 and another reference to $7,000 appeared in the discussion — and that buying and maintaining professional testing equipment would also carry recurring calibration and maintenance costs. Council members noted that low-cost handheld decibel meters cost a few hundred dollars each, but professional setups and calibration could amount to several thousand dollars.
Speakers also debated technical and legal issues. Some said a simple decibel threshold might allow the town to purchase meters and perform basic screening itself, while others cautioned that a flat decibel limit could unfairly penalize residents living near highways or industrial operations because ambient noise levels vary widely by neighborhood. One participant suggested that isolating the noise source — distinguishing plant exhaust fans from highway traffic or other industrial sounds — would remain an enforcement challenge even with decibel readings.
Several council members suggested comparing Burns Harbor’s ordinance with those of nearby municipalities and consulting experts or state agencies. A council member offered to contact a local official named Amy for guidance on technical and permitting questions. Speakers also noted that complaints about operation-of-business noise often fall under building- or code-enforcement authorities rather than police response.
No formal changes to the ordinance were proposed or voted on during the discussion. Council members framed the meeting as the start of a conversation to explore options, seek cost estimates, and consider whether to revise the ordinance’s measurement method, fine structure, or enforcement responsibilities.
Next steps mentioned in the meeting included staff and council members researching other municipalities’ noise thresholds, getting cost estimates for equipment and outside testing, and returning to the council with recommendations for any ordinance amendments or procedural changes.
