Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Highway Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wyoming Senate committee backs redirecting certain motor-vehicle sales taxes to highway fund after sharp debate
Summary
The Wyoming Senate committee of the whole voted to recommend House Bill 33, shifting specified motor‑vehicle and trailer sales‑tax revenue into the state highway fund after a daylong floor debate over long‑term funding and budget tradeoffs.
Get email alerts on the Transportation Highway Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Wyoming Senate committee of the whole voted to report House Bill 33 with a favorable recommendation, a move that redirects certain sales-and-use tax revenue from motor vehicle and trailer sales into the state highway fund.
Proponents, including Senator Anthony B. Brennan (explaining the bill), said the change would channel existing motor‑vehicle sales tax revenue into long-neglected road maintenance and preservation. "Funding for the department that takes care of our roads has been flat for basically 20 years," Brennan said during the floor explanation, noting that replacement costs and equipment (a snow‑plow truck example) have risen substantially.
Opponents warned of fiscal risk and lack of legislative control over spending. Senator Cole said the measure would remove roughly $70 million a year from the general fund and leave the Legislature with less control over how the funds are spent by the Wyoming Department of Transportation. "My biggest problem with this whole thought is there's no control," Cole said.
Other senators who spoke included Senator Randolph Driscoll, who urged investment now to avoid much higher reconstruction costs later; Senator Rafas, who said he supported the bill in other sessions but could not back it in this budget environment; and Majority Floor Leader Senator Pappas, who moved the committee recommendation and framed the bill as a needed step to preserve highways and to preserve federal matching capacity.
The floor debate included technical and policy points: several senators urged amendments that would direct funds to horizontal (road) construction rather than vertical construction (buildings), and multiple speakers noted the Legislature can consider second‑reading amendments to narrow uses. Senator Hicks, sponsor of a Committee of the Whole amendment on House Bill 5 earlier in the day, also explained that implementation timing and advisory boards should give the agency time to set up systems for registration and fees; analogous implementation questions were raised for HB33's funding flows.
The motion was carried (division called during the consideration) and the committee reported the bill favorably. The Senate recorded a standing/voice vote in committee and indicated the ayes carried; a subsequent division call registered 17 in favor during one procedural moment. The committee of the whole report recommending passage of House Bill 33 was adopted on the floor.
Why it matters: supporters said the bill supplies recurring revenue to pay for routine maintenance, preservation and limited capital needs at a time when purchasing power for road work has fallen. Opponents said moving money out of the general fund reduces flexibility for schools and other programs amid planned revenue reductions and that the Legislature should retain stronger appropriation control.
Outlook: The bill as reported will proceed through the Senate process; senators indicated possible second‑reading amendments to limit uses to horizontal construction or to add reporting requirements.
Votes at a glance: See the companion "Votes at a glance" article for a full list of concurrence and committee outcomes recorded in today's session.

