Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wind Energy Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
RWE representatives brief Humboldt County supervisors on proposed wind project, discuss zoning, road and decommissioning protections
Summary
Representatives from RWE told the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday that the company is exploring a potential wind project and plans an early-spring public open house to present information and take questions.
Get email alerts on the Wind Energy Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representatives from RWE told the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday that the company is exploring a potential wind project in the county and plans to hold a public open house in early spring to share information and gather questions.
RWE community outreach representative Kevin Columbus said the company is "exploring the option of . . . an open house or public info session sometime early this spring" and that staff will bring third-party subject-matter experts so residents may ask questions in a low-pressure setting. Columbus said RWE’s projects are privately financed and that the company includes funds for decommissioning in its planning. "All of our projects are privately financed," Columbus said. "The subsidy at the end is nice, but we have that money allocated, same way for decommissioning." (Columbus, community outreach, RWE.)
Why this matters: Supervisors and staff repeatedly said zoning, setbacks and road and drainage protections are central to any future decisions about hosting utility-scale wind in Humboldt County. County officials also described an existing moratorium on new wind towers that remains in effect until the county finishes updates to its comprehensive plan and ordinances.
Discussion details and company commitments
At the meeting, RWE said it is seeking venues and timing for a county-level public meeting and prefers to work directly with the county rather than through statewide lobbying. Jeremy Jones introduced himself as a company representative and Columbus handled the public remarks and technical assurances.
RWE staff discussed several topics supervisors asked about: financing, road and tile repairs, decommissioning and repowering. On financing Columbus said projects are privately financed and that subsidies are helpful but not required for a project to proceed. On decommissioning and post-construction obligations, a company representative said those items "are included" in their contracts and planning.
Roads, tile and repowering
County officials pressed RWE on road and drainage protections. Company staff described standard practices used in other Iowa counties: pre-construction video of roads, temporary driveways, and financial guarantees or payments to repair damage after heavy construction traffic. When asked how long RWE would guarantee tile or drainage repairs, a company representative said, "If it shows up in 7 years, we're gonna fix it." The representative added that repowering (replacement or major overhaul of turbines decades after installation) would typically be handled under a new contract with landowners.
Supervisors cited examples from other counties — including Webster, Boone and Wright counties — where video documentation, independent engineers and TIF (tax increment financing) strategies were used to manage construction impacts and local benefits. Multiple supervisors told RWE the county expects explicit, enforceable provisions for restoring roads and drainage and urged careful zoning and setback language so the county is not left to litigate enforcement later.
Comprehensive plan and moratorium status
Supervisors said the county has removed the sunset date on its wind moratorium and that the moratorium will remain until the Comprehensive Plan chapters and updated ordinances are complete. A county official told the board that chapters 5 and 6 of the Comprehensive Plan are expected back for a 2–3 week review before a final draft is circulated for adoption and subsequent ordinance updates.
What was not decided
The meeting recorded discussion and company briefings but no formal decisions, permits, or approvals related to siting or project entitlements were taken. Supervisors repeatedly emphasized that any future approvals or ordinance changes will follow the county’s planning, zoning and permitting processes.
Ending
RWE representatives said they want to work with the county and hosted public engagement; supervisors said they want strong, enforceable protections covering setbacks, road restoration, drainage and decommissioning before any final approvals would be considered.

