Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Teacher Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews professional‑learning community approach and intervention plans for student learning

2113152 · January 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District leaders described a PLC (professional-learning community) approach that emphasizes four critical questions, common formative assessments and tiered interventions; the board discussed intervention timing and use of in‑day supports.

District leaders described the Chester County school system’s emphasis on creating Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) that focus teachers on “four critical questions” about standards, assessment and intervention.

Superintendent Mr. Gilger explained the PLC shift is intended to make teacher collaboration the norm rather than isolation. He said teachers will identify “power standards,” create short common formative assessments, and use tiered interventions aligned with classroom instruction so that students needing extra help receive support that is “lockstep with what the teacher of record is doing.” Gilger said the district has used these elements for years but is renewing focus on collaborative structures.

Board members pressed on how interventions will be delivered during the school day without relying on after‑school programs. Gilger responded that the preferred model is to have Tier 1 teachers deliver initial interventions during the regular instructional day and to coordinate tier‑2 and tier‑3 supports so they align with classroom instruction rather than operate on disconnected curricula.

The board noted the district’s work with an external PLC consultant, Nathaniel from Solution Tree, who is scheduled to return for another cycle this year; staff said they will assess further consultant use at the close of the current cycle. No formal action was taken; the discussion was an informational update.

The board also heard that the state’s report cards had been released publicly and that the district is sharing reward‑school recognitions it received for two schools.