Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cochise County staff outline $1.9 million DPS grant to fund counterdrug team, raise pension and downstream-cost questions
Summary
County staff told the Board of Supervisors a continuation grant from the Arizona Department of Public Safety would fund wages and benefits for a counterdrug team; supervisors pressed staff about pension liabilities, jail costs and how future grants must account for general-fund impacts.
The Cochise County Board of Supervisors heard details Thursday about a continuation grant from the Arizona Department of Public Safety worth about $1.9 million that county staff said would pay wages and employee-related expenses for a county counterdrug team.
County staff said the funding would pay salaries and benefits for law-enforcement personnel assigned to drug- and smuggling-related enforcement work. Captain Jertie, speaking for the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office, described the grant as "funding to pay wages and EREs for those personnel that do that work." He said the positions funded by the grant are “roughly, 9 deputies and, a captain and 2 sergeant's positions.”
The nut of the discussion was budgetary and long-term: supervisors pressed staff on whether grant-funded positions create future pension liabilities and other downstream costs, and whether the grant covers incarceration or court-related costs. Captain Jertie said the grant is a continuation and described a portion of the award as earmarked for the jail; the transcript recorded both “$20,000” and, when later discussed, “$120,000” as earmarks within the $1.9 million award, which staff did not conclusively reconcile on the record.
Supervisors and staff discussed pension implications. Supervisor Crosby cautioned against selecting personnel for grant-funded positions on the basis of their pension tier, saying such selection “wouldn’t be prudent” and could raise discrimination concerns. Jennifer Graham, the county’s human resources director, said staff do not routinely record whether incoming applicants were previously members of the public safety retirement system and would need to work with finance to estimate any pension-cost differential. Graham also noted that some hires are grandfathered into earlier pension tiers if they were already members of a public-safety plan elsewhere.
Board members pushed staff to quantify the full budgetary impact of accepting future grants, beyond payroll. Supervisor Crosby said that after July 1 the county intends to require grants that have budgetary impact to be reviewed “for the full budgetary impact,” including any effect on the general fund unless the grant precludes such coverage. Supervisors described ancillary costs — vehicles, insurance, maintenance, and long-term pension obligations — that may not be covered by grant awards and therefore shift costs to the county later.
Staff said the grant language allows some flexibility in how funded positions are used, including moving personnel within posted positions as operational needs change. Captain Jertie and staff repeatedly described the award as "continuing" funding for interdiction and related duties. Commander Watkins was referenced in the meeting as taking previous board commentary seriously and looking into ways to fulfill the enforcement vision supervisors outlined.
The board did not take a formal vote on the grant during the work session. Staff indicated they would provide additional information, including a detailed breakdown of earmarks and any updated analysis of downstream costs, when the grant appears on the regular meeting agenda.
The discussion highlighted the county’s effort to balance obtaining state funds for public safety work while avoiding unintended long-term budget obligations that could burden the general fund.
