Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Matanuska-Susitna planning commission approves RV campground permit in Denali State Park after removing flight restrictions
Summary
On Jan. 6 the Matanuska-Susitna Borough Planning Commission approved Resolution 24-33, granting a conditional use permit for an RV campground resort at 4852 North Parks Highway in Denali State Park, but removed a staff-recommended condition that would have regulated helicopter flight paths and times.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Matanuska-Susitna Borough Planning Commission on Jan. 6 approved Resolution 24-33, granting a conditional use permit to construct and operate an RV campground resort at 4852 North Parks Highway in Denali State Park. The commission removed a staff-recommended condition that would have attempted to limit helicopter flight paths and times after staff said such regulation is likely preempted by federal law.
The permit authorizes development of the southern half of an 85-acre parcel owned by Yolanda Doyen, with proposed amenities that include about 40 RV sites, 14 duplex cabins, tent camping areas, a convenience store and food concession, a viewing deck and tour-bus parking, a pedestrian bridge, a planned public ramp to the Chulitna River, and a proposed helipad for third‑party tour operators. The applicant, represented by civil engineer Tim Alley of the Butte Company on behalf of First Colony Developers, said the heliport would be operated by a third party if used and that the application requests a maximum of one tour per hour as a threshold, not a guaranteed level of activity.
Staff planner Peggy Horton told commissioners the application packet and staff report recommended approval but that staff had removed condition number 6 — language attempting to regulate flight paths and times — because "it was determined that the regulation of flight patterns and time of day flights are matters for which the regulation is likely preempted by Federal law." Horton also recommended editing several findings of fact to reflect DNR comments, to clarify that bear monitoring is performed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game rather than park rangers, and to add a whereas noting the property is privately owned by Yolanda Doyen.
The applicant described site improvements intended to address safety and resource concerns: a realigned driveway to match the opposite-side access, coordination with the Alaska Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration for access across the Parks Highway, a pedestrian bridge crossing an anadromous creek (requiring a Department of Fish and Game permit), bear‑proof trash receptacles and dumpster monitoring, informational pamphlets and check‑in briefings for guests, and year‑round on‑site staff. Alley said a fuel storage tank sized for potential helicopter refueling was described in the application but reiterated that a helicopter operator had not been contracted and that the one‑per‑hour figure represented a maximum.
The public hearing drew substantial comment. Staff recorded 103 written comments received between Dec. 7 and Jan. 17; staff said 102 of those opposed helicopter operations, one supported the application as submitted, and the remainder raised other concerns (driveway permitting, development scale, water‑access details, need for other permits, and wildlife/bear‑safety). Dozens of speakers at the hearing urged denial or modification of the helipad provision, citing noise, visual impact, disturbance to wildlife, harm to the park’s character and visitor experience, fire risk, and light pollution. Multiple speakers also asked for additional time for community councils to review and comment.
Several nearby residents and long‑time area users spoke against allowing commercial helicopter sightseeing from the site. John Strasenburgh, who identified himself as a nearby resident and lodge owner, told commissioners: "Helicopters do not belong here," and said a pattern of repeated flights would be incompatible with the park’s stated wilderness character. Other speakers raised concerns about impacts to salmon spawning in the Chulitna system, road safety at the proposed highway access, and the potential for increased emergency calls or wildfire risk from greater human use.
A minority of commenters supported the project as written. Photographer and tour operator Jeff Schultz and a few property owners said additional cabin and campground capacity would create local economic opportunity and better options for visitors. Clyde Armistead, a nearby property owner, described some helicopter operations he had observed as quieter than opponents described and urged commissioners to consider the full range of helicopter types and routing.
During deliberations commissioners amended the staff recommendation in three ways: deleting condition number 6 (the flight‑path/time restrictions), replacing the word "park" with "operation" in one finding to clarify responsibilities, and removing a sentence that would have required staff to coordinate with the Kasugiken Campground park ranger office. Commissioners also added a whereas to the resolution affirming the subject property is privately owned by Yolanda Doyen. After those amendments the motion to approve the conditional use permit passed with no objections and was adopted as amended.
The commission’s action grants the conditional use permit but does not relieve the applicant of other required permits and approvals. The applicant and staff noted future permits still required include federal and state permits for highway access, a Department of Fish and Game permit for the pedestrian crossing of an anadromous stream, and any state park or DNR permits that may be required for a public boat launch. DNR had commented in writing that landing on state lands is not allowed for commercial operations without a permit and that such permits, where available, are limited to specific purposes.
The commission proceeded from a quasi‑judicial hearing; the chair reminded members to avoid ex parte contacts on this matter. The commission’s decision is the borough’s final administrative action on the conditional use permit; any further restrictions on aircraft operations would involve federal or state authorities or subsequent permitting processes.

