The Historic and Architectural Preservation Board on Jan. 9 approved guidelines to establish a Legacy Award program that will accept public nominations for projects and individuals who preserve Venice history.

Harry Klinkhammer, the city's historical resources manager, presented a memo and a draft set of guidelines that split the award into two broad categories: historic preservation (restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction or additions to historic properties) and historic achievement (contributions to preserving Venice history). "Harry Klinkhammer, historical resources manager," said Klinkhammer in opening his presentation.

Board members discussed the categories and wording. Several members recommended emphasizing the "historical achievement" category (contributions by people or organizations) and refining the definition of "new construction" so the award would cover sensitive additions to historic structures rather than wholly new standalone buildings. One board member suggested removing "new construction" as a standalone category; staff and members settled on rewording to clarify that additions to historic properties that sensitively respect original structures could qualify.

The board also discussed whether landscapes, pocket parks and historic trees could be eligible; members agreed the guidelines could be revised later if there was interest, but they did not block inclusion of "property" (not just structures) within restoration and reconstruction categories.

Klinkhammer said staff intends to announce the program in December, accept applications through March, and present awards in May during Historic Preservation Month. He noted the board could consider a year-round nomination option with an annual March review. The board discussed how winners might be recognized; past winners received council proclamations, and members discussed creating a plaque listing winners at city hall or the Venice museum.

After discussing minor wording and scope clarifications, a board member moved to approve the guidelines "with the suggested changes." The motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.

The board directed staff to finalize the wording changes discussed and proceed with outreach to open nominations to the public. Members said the program can be amended later based on responses.