Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cathedral City study session: staff report recommends keeping current practice for commission chair selection; council signals no change
Summary
City staff presented a report at the Cathedral City City Council study session on Feb. 12 examining how chair and vice chair positions are chosen for the city’s commissions and committees.
Get email alerts on the Appointments Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff presented a report at the Cathedral City City Council study session on Feb. 12 examining how chair and vice chair positions are chosen for the city’s commissions and committees. Staff told the council the municipal code (Chapter 2.06) assigns commissioners three-year terms and that, unless otherwise specified, commission members elect their own chair and vice chair by a simple vote of the commission.
The report said Cathedral City’s practice matches the majority of Coachella Valley cities the staff reviewed. Indian Wells and Indio were noted as exceptions: Indian Wells uses a seniority-based system for selecting commission officers, while Indio establishes seniority partly by the nominating council member’s district number. Staff also told council members the city has eight commissions with council-appointed seats, and that changing the selection method would require an amendment to the municipal code and associated city attorney and staff time. "This report is for information and discussion only," a city staff presenter said.
Why it matters: commission chairs and vice chairs preside over advisory bodies that recommend policy to the council and, in some cases, handle technical or quasi-judicial matters. Council members framed the question as whether a citywide rotation or a commissioner vote best preserves commission effectiveness and volunteer engagement.
During the discussion, elected officials who spoke favored leaving selection to commissioners. Council members raised two consistent points: council appointees are vetted before appointment, and forcing a fixed rotation could require commissioners to assume leadership roles some are neither willing nor suited to perform, potentially hampering commission work. One council member summarized the prevailing view as preferring to "leave it up to the members of the commissions to choose." Staff noted recent practical obstacles — several commissions temporarily lacked quorums because of low membership — but said where commissions have met they generally selected officers by unanimous or majority votes.
The council did not adopt an ordinance or direct staff to prepare a municipal code change at the meeting. Staff said any formal change would necessitate drafting an amendment to Chapter 2.06 of the Cathedral City Municipal Code and would likely require city attorney time and additional staff work.
Public input and written comment: staff summarized one emailed comment, from Danny Lee, who suggested using seniority for chair and vice chair elections and standardizing agendas across commissions; the commenter’s materials were made available for public inspection.
What’s next: the item was presented for information and discussion; no formal direction or code amendment was recorded in the minutes of the study session.

