Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rules Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council opens review of meeting rules; staff to propose amendments drawn from municipal "Bob's Rules" and Appendix A
Summary
Councilors discussed adopting or adapting alternate meeting rules to allow discussion before motions and to simplify procedures; the city attorney and staff will draft a la carte amendments to Appendix A and present recommended language.
Pueblo City Council opened a discussion on Feb. 22 about whether to modify its meeting procedures to allow more flexible discussion before motions and to adopt selected provisions from an alternate municipal guide known as "Bob's Rules of Order," an increasingly used municipal adaptation of Robert's Rules.
Why it matters: Council procedure determines how deliberations, motions and votes are handled. Several members said current practice sometimes limits discussion until after motions are made; others warned wholesale adoption of a new rule set would create confusion.
What was discussed: Several councilors and the deputy city attorney reviewed how RobertRules and Bob's Rules differ; one commonly cited advantage of Bob's is that it permits more discussion before a formal motion is on the floor.
Attorney Harley Gifford recommended an "a la carte" approach rather than wholesale adoption: council should identify which specific procedures from Bob's it likes and amend Appendix A (the councils codified rules) to incorporate those items while leaving Robert's as the fallback authority.
Reconsideration and procedural clarifications: The clerk reviewed the motion-to-reconsider process and the 10-day window to bring a motion to reconsider after a vote; the city attorney confirmed procedural options for a councilor who believes they voted in error. The discussion also covered how the "previous question" and other motions work in practice and whether changes would allow more efficient but still fair debate.
Next steps: Council asked staff and the city attorney to review Appendix A and return with a short menu of candidate rule changes drawn from Bob's that staff believes would be helpful and legally consistent with current charter and public-meeting law. Gifford said he preferred targeted amendments to a wholesale swap to avoid conflicting authorities.
Ending: Council members signaled support for revisiting a small number of procedural reforms (for example, permitting limited discussion before a motion is on the floor) and asked staff to circulate proposed language and examples before considering a formal amendment to Appendix A.
