Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge transparency and reforms at San Bernardino animal shelter after multiple alleged deaths and handling errors
Summary
Multiple residents and volunteers told the council the animal shelter has problems including alleged misidentification, possible electrocution, failure to spay/neuter before adoption and data gaps; volunteers and speakers demanded investigations, better oversight and enforcement of shelter procedures.
A string of public commenters during the Feb. 18 City Council meeting raised repeated, detailed allegations about operations at the San Bernardino animal shelter, including reports of animal deaths, alleged mishandling and requests for greater transparency and accountability.
Speakers included volunteers, pet owners and residents who described cases they said showed systemic problems. A family described their dog, identified in public comment as “Potato,” as wrongly taken to the shelter after an alleged misidentification; commenters said Potato later died while at the shelter. Volunteers and other residents said they have documentary evidence and video related to handling and euthanasia procedures and requested the council direct staff to investigate and to publish shelter records. Several speakers also alleged animals were electrocuted and cited a video they said documents mistreatment.
Multiple speakers faulted the shelter for releasing animals that were not spayed or neutered and then allowing those animals to reproduce after adoption; one volunteer said the shelter is giving animals out while they are unsterilized, which has led to additional pups on the street. A volunteer and others cited a lack of public data on intake/outcome categories (age, species, gender, source, breed) and presented a rough calculation that, in their view, about 50% of animals entering the shelter do not leave alive. They urged the council to require the shelter to publish full intake/outcome data and to permit independent review.
Council response and staff follow-up requests: councilmembers acknowledged the seriousness of the public comments and asked staff to follow up with the shelter director and return with information. Councilmembers asked about possible audits, the shelter’s sterilization and adoption policies, oversight of euthanasia procedures and options to increase volunteer oversight and transparency.
What the council did not do at the meeting: the council did not vote on a specific shelter policy change or a forensic audit during the Feb. 18 meeting. Several residents asked for a forensic audit and more funding or staffing to improve shelter operations; councilmembers asked staff to report back, indicating they would take the issue up in a future staff report.
The public record: speakers said they would provide video and documentary evidence to staff and to the council. Several asked that the city post a transparent timeline for review and corrective actions and to include volunteers and external stakeholders in oversight.
