Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Human Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants brief commissioners on consolidated human services model; CCR Consulting presents assessment work
Summary
CCR Consulting briefed the newly constituted Person County Board of Commissioners on the county’s consolidated human services model, described board responsibilities, and summarized an ongoing assessment of social services that includes community and client outreach and planned program orientations.
CCR Consulting presented a high‑level orientation Dec. 2 to the Person County Board of Commissioners on the county’s consolidated human services model and the commissioners’ responsibilities as the consolidated human services board.
Sherry Bradshaw (CCR Consulting) and Rebecca Troutman (CCR Consulting) outlined the state‑supervised, county‑administered model used in North Carolina and explained that Person County had adopted a consolidated model in which the board of county commissioners serves as the human services board. Bradshaw reviewed duties that accompany that governing model, including advising on social conditions, assuring compliance with state and federal programs, approving certain program fees where applicable, reviewing required performance metrics and signing memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with the state.
CCR described ongoing assessment work: more than 200 interviews with county staff, community partners and other stakeholders; a community forum held Sept. 17; and client and partner surveys (the consultant reported 98 client survey responses and 14 community‑partner survey responses to date). CCR said it has drafted an early‑wins list and would present program‑specific orientations and findings in the coming months. Planned next steps noted in the presentation included a January work session focused on child welfare and additional program orientations in February on energy assistance, child care and child support.
CCR also described the county’s MOU with the Department of Health and Human Services and advised periodic reporting to the board on performance metrics; the consultants said Person County is in substantial compliance with its current MOU but encouraged ongoing monitoring.
Commission discussion touched on governance options used by other counties, how the county might establish citizen advisory groups, and the timeline for CCR’s engagement (the consulting contract runs through March). Commissioners asked for individual interviews to provide input; CCR offered to schedule those sessions.
There was no formal board action required at the presentation; commissioners thanked the consultants and requested follow‑up briefings and orientations on specific programs.
