Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Witnesses split over HB 10 provisions on cultivated meat labeling and public procurement
Summary
The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee heard split testimony on House Bill 10's labeling and procurement provisions for cultivated meat, with an attorney urging the committee to oppose the bill and an industry scientist warning restrictions could harm innovation in Ohio.
The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee heard in-person testimony for and against provisions of substitute amended House Bill 10 that address food labeling and procurement of novel products such as cultivated (cell-cultured) meat.
Rachel Kilgore, an attorney and New Albany resident testifying as an opponent, urged the committee to reject the bill "in its entirety as it is written with the amendments accepted today." Kilgore told the committee she was concerned the bill's "origin . . . would trace back to feelings and speculation, as well as statistics with no citations," and said the bill's language contained grammatical ambiguities. She argued the bill places burdens on parties other than those it purports to protect and questioned the practical relevance of some provisions: "But since when are they…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
