Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tif Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gary redevelopment director outlines inventory, sunsets and limits of city TIF districts
Summary
Redevelopment Director Christopher Harris reviewed 11 tax-increment financing (TIF) districts, their purposes, acreage and projected sunset dates, and told council staff would provide an electronic list with expirations and spending plans.
Get email alerts on the Tif Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Christopher Harris, redevelopment director, gave the finance committee a detailed overview of the city’s tax-increment financing (TIF) districts, their histories, project purposes and projected sunset dates, and answered council questions about which parcels and increments feed redevelopment activity.
Harris said Gary has about 11 TIF districts across the city, including the Lakefront TIF (Buffington Harbor area, established 2000, roughly 110 acres, projected to sunset in 2029), the Kirkyard TIF (established 2012, set to expire 2036), the Truck City TIF (established 2007, expected sunset 2037), the County Market TIF (established 2004, projected to sunset 2027), a consolidated Midtown/Downtown TIF used largely for demolition and infrastructure, the Dalton Arms TIF (rehabilitation of an eight‑story apartment building), Madison Townhomes TIF (established 1995, showing a 2025 sunset), Lancaster/DuSable TIF (established 1995, about 14 acres, projected 2025 sunset), Midwest Center TIF (established 2002 to support industrial corridor improvements), and an East Lakefront TIF established in 2015 (about 56.7 acres). Harris said he would follow up with exact expiration dates where the documents in his packet were incomplete.
Harris described how project‑specific TIFs typically direct increment to repay debt issued for the particular project (for example, rail expansion or Truck City development) and noted that some TIFs have little or no outstanding debt while others must satisfy bondholder claims. He said the County Market TIF did not meet earlier projection-based valuations and the redevelopment office issued letters of insufficiency to bondholders. Harris said the consolidated TIF and the Lakefront TIF currently provide the most available increment for redevelopment work.
Council members asked whether TIFs could be established in historically residential neighborhoods such as Glen Park or Morningside; Harris said the mayor has expressed interest in exploring a Glen Park TIF anchored on Broadway and Ridge Road but warned that recent changes in state law (Senate Bill 1) affect the financial modeling for residential TIFs and make them a higher-risk option now. Harris recommended caution and additional modeling with financial consultants.
When asked about the airport area, Harris said the airport TIF is treated as an Airport Development Zone (ADZ) and may not appear on Indiana Gateway in the same way as standard TIFs; he offered to research the airport ADZ details and provide the council with documentation. Harris told members the redevelopment commission, not the council, typically approves spending plans before those are proposed to the council and that the full spending plan had not yet been approved by the commission for 2026; he said the redevelopment commission’s approved plan must be provided to the council once complete.
Harris also summarized policy considerations: whether to recapture increment back to the general fund as a source for public safety and other services, or to invest increment in further redevelopment projects; he stressed that TIFs are a “gamble” dependent on whether a project increases assessed value enough to generate increment and warned about the risk of issuing bonds when projected valuations are not met.
Council members asked Harris to email an electronic list of all TIFs with expiration dates and a spending plan alignment; Harris agreed to provide those materials.

