Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Rv Park topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors raise enforcement concerns about RV campground conditional‑use permit; commission continues review
Summary
Neighbors told the commission that Marvin Neff’s RV campground permit has not complied with conditions (length‑of‑stay limits, dumpster enclosure and reporting). Staff said permit reports were requested and provided for recent months; the commission left the item on the agenda for further verification and enforcement follow‑up.
Neighbors of the RV campground at 769 South Main told the Planning Commission Feb. 6 that they believe the conditional‑use permit holder is not complying with permit conditions and applicable city ordinances.
Rue Wiley, a neighbor who identified his address during public comment, said the campground rotates occupants “every 90 days” and residents sometimes live on site much longer than allowed. Wiley and other neighbors said the campground lacks a required enclosure around its dumpster and that the documentation the permittee provided to the city did not match observed conditions.
Maddie, a Willard City staff member, said staff had requested records from the campground operator (Brenton/permit holder) and that the operator recently supplied lists of arrivals and departures. Maddie and other staff said they would verify the records against field observations, including periodic drive‑throughs or video checks, and check compliance with the conditional‑use permit’s 18‑month compliance requirements for certain items.
Commission members and neighbors discussed enforcement options. Neighbors urged the city to inspect and, if necessary, enforce the permit conditions; staff noted the permit requires the campground to follow city ordinances and that the conditional‑use permit includes an 18‑month compliance timeline for certain improvements.
The commission decided to continue monitoring the item and asked staff to verify the operator’s records, perform drive‑through inspections to compare to the submitted lists, and report back. Commissioners said they would leave the conditional‑use permit on the agenda until staff confirms compliance or identifies actionable violations.
The commission did not take enforcement action at the meeting; staff said they would follow up with inspections and provide an updated compliance report at a future meeting.
