Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tiburon Design Review Board: votes at a glance (Feb. 6, 2025)

2258656 ยท February 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Summary of formal votes taken by the Tiburon Town Design Review Board on Feb. 6, 2025: adoption of Jan. 16 minutes, approval of consent calendar, approval of 322 Karen Way (variances), and approval of 1801 Lagoon View Drive (variances and conditions).

The Tiburon Town Design Review Board on Feb. 6, 2025 recorded the following formal actions during its meeting:

- Adoption of minutes from the Jan. 16, 2025 meeting: Motion to adopt the minutes carried unanimously; no amendments noted. (Vote: unanimous among members present.)

- Adoption of the consent calendar (including the item for 21 Mar Vista Court and related Condition No. 13 wording): Motion to adopt the consent calendar carried unanimously. Staff confirmed Condition No. 13 wording and no public comment changed the item. (Vote: unanimous among members present.)

- PH 1322 โ€” 322 Karen Way: Motion to adopt the staff-prepared resolution approving the single-story addition (672 sq ft total) and making findings for the requested side-yard setback variance and a retroactive fence-height variance. Motion passed unanimously. (Board directed permit processing per staff conditions.)

- PH 2 โ€” 1801 Lagoon View Drive: Motion to adopt the staff-prepared resolution approving the second-story addition above the garage, with findings for an additional lot-coverage variance and a minor side-yard setback adjustment. The board amended conditions to require fixed, shielded exterior downlights and to require an evergreen replacement (minimum 24-inch container) if a neighboring screening pine must be removed. Motion passed unanimously.

All motions were recorded as adopting staff-prepared resolutions; specific resolution numbers were not specified in the hearing record. Where applicants sought variances, the board stated findings and adopted the resolutions as prepared by staff.