Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner Webb urges rule requiring proof of funding before consent items
Summary
At a Collin County Commissioners Court meeting, Commissioner Webb asked that consent-agenda items be held unless funding is verified, citing a lack of budget authority to block underfunded items; the court approved the remainder of the consent agenda 5-0.
At a meeting of the Collin County Commissioners Court (date not specified), Commissioner Webb asked the court to adopt a process that would prevent items without identified funding from appearing on the consent agenda.
The request came during consideration of the court’s consent agenda, after Webb asked to pull several items for discussion. “From my perspective, I'd like to see a process put in place whereby anything to be on consent has to be physically there has to be the funds necessary allocated to it before it ever shows up on consent,” Commissioner Webb said.
The exchange followed confusion about which consent items had been pulled. The court voted to approve the remainder of the consent agenda; the judge announced the motion “carries 5 to 0.”
Webb told the court the county budget office currently has “no mechanism for budget to basically stop an item from ending up on consent,” and warned that approving consent items without confirmed funding could create obligations that affect future years. He asked staff to develop a mechanism so “nothing ends up on consent that doesn't have the funding to cover the item.”
The judge noted one previously accepted gift item had been taken onto the county inventory “with no repair budget and no replacement budget,” and said staff would verify whether departments can operate gifted items without additional spending or whether the items must return to the court for further action.
No new formal rule was adopted at the meeting. The court’s immediate vote approved the remainder of the consent agenda; staff said they would review the gifted item’s maintenance needs and report back if additional funding or a change in acceptance terms is required.
The discussion occurred during the Commissioners Court’s general business; court staff and commissioners said they would follow up with the budget office to clarify procedures for future agendas.
