Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Historic board unanimously recommends Venice Beach Pavilion for local register

2303400 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Historic and Architectural Preservation Board voted to recommend that the city place the Venice Beach Pavilion at 101 South Esplanade on the Local Register of Historic Resources (PLAR25000202). The board cited the pavilion's 1964 hyperbolic-paraboloid roof and local architectural significance; next step is City Council ordinance consideration.

The Historic and Architectural Preservation Board voted unanimously to recommend that the Venice Beach Pavilion at 101 South Esplanade be placed on the City of Venice Local Register of Historic Resources (PLAR25000202).

Historical-resources manager Harry Klinkhammer told the board the pavilion, completed in 1964 and designed by William Lind and Cyril Tucker, is significant for its mid-century modern and Googie-influenced hyperbolic-paraboloid roof and its role in the community’s beach history. “What we have before you today is a nomination, to the local register of historical resources for 101 South Esplanade, otherwise known as the Venice Beach Pavilion,” Klinkhammer said during his staff presentation.

Klinkhammer described the structure as a roughly 6,500-square-foot complex that features a 64-foot-square hyperbolic-paraboloid roof over a concession and changing area. He said the city originally built the pavilion to replace a beach casino from the 1930s and that the design was notable both for its geometry and the city’s economical use of plywood in the roof framing. He noted earlier engineering studies and public-works observations of rust in internal metal pipes and deterioration in three main supporting columns; he told the board those columns should be examined first.

Board members asked about preservation incentives and repair funding. Klinkhammer said being on the local register does not guarantee state grant funding but does improve a project’s rank in the State of Florida review process; state grants require matching local funds. He added that federal incentives are limited to tax credits for income-producing properties, and there are no federal preservation grants that operate like the state matching program. He also noted that local listing can assist in FEMA “50 percent rule” considerations for publicly owned properties.

After discussion, a motion to recommend the nomination to City Council passed on roll-call vote with all members voting yes. The board recorded seven affirmative votes. Klinkhammer told the board that, if the board’s recommendation is approved by council, the city will place the pavilion on the local register by ordinance, a process that requires two council meetings; staff estimated the earliest listing would occur in March with final action in April given the required readings and schedule.

The board did not set a repair cost estimate and referred questions about specific structural repairs and pricing to Public Works. Klinkhammer said staff could look at grant opportunities once the property is formally listed and when the city budgets the required local match in the FY26 cycle.

The board’s recommendation now goes to City Council for two readings as an ordinance; staff said approval at council is required before the pavilion is added to the Local Register of Historic Resources.