Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fayetteville–Cumberland parks indirect‑cost study draws county scrutiny; commissioners send dispute to finance committee
Summary
City and county staff presented a cost‑allocation (indirect cost) analysis that would raise the county’s payment for shared Parks & Recreation administrative services from $60,000 (since 2004) to about $580,000; commissioners voted to send the study and supporting documents to the finance committee for review.
County and city staff on Jan. 9 gave commissioners a briefing on the Parks and Recreation cost allocation that the city said would raise the county’s longstanding $60,000 annual indirect payment to roughly $580,000, prompting commissioners to refer the matter to the county Finance Committee for detailed review.
Michael Gibson, director of Fayetteville Parks & Recreation, walked the board through the history of the consolidated parks and recreation district, the services that are shared between the city and county (senior centers, adaptive programs, some aquatic and senior center spending) and the mechanics of indirect costs. Gibson said the city had engaged Maximus to prepare a cost-allocation plan; city staff estimated the county’s indirect share at about $580,000 based on that analysis.
County commissioners and staff asked for detailed line‑item backup, including the supporting allocation methodology and per‑site cost breakdowns. Commissioners said they want clear visibility into what is being allocated to each rec center and how capital and operating costs were included, and several requested copies of the Maximus allocation report and account‑level details for each facility. Commissioners also discussed that the county’s share has been a fixed $60,000 since 2004 and that the value and scale of park assets and services have grown over time.
Commissioner Patel moved to send the allocation and supporting documents to the Finance Committee for deeper review and a recommendation back to the full board; the motion passed unanimously. County staff said detailed, itemized data — including capital spending and per‑center operating costs — will be provided ahead of the Finance Committee meeting for committee members and the full board to review.
