Hundreds of residents urge commissioners to block or slow Sheffield Island development; county says formal process must be followed
Loading...
Summary
Dozens of residents, local conservationists and river advocates spoke at the Camden County meeting to oppose a proposed development and possible annexation of Sheffield Island; commissioners said no formal application had been filed with the county and described the planning and annexation process that would apply if one is submitted.
Dozens of nearby landowners and river advocates told the Camden County Board of Commissioners they oppose a proposed large‑scale development on Sheffield Island and urged the county and the city of Kingsland to deny annexation or to subject any proposal to rigorous environmental and infrastructure review.
“Just because you can build, does not mean you should build,” said Jennifer Clark, a resident of Sheffield Island Road, summarizing concerns about marsh runoff, wildlife impacts and storm‑resilience.
Residents’ concerns and evidence: At the public comment section, speakers repeatedly cited the scale of the proposal described by developers in earlier public forums — figures mentioned by commenters included approximately 351 acres and up to 750 homes — and warned of increased traffic on Simmons Bluff Road and Harriett’s Bluff Road, long construction periods, loss of mature live oaks and damage to marsh habitat. Several speakers referenced shoreline erosion they have observed in recent years and questioned whether proposed stormwater controls and buffers would remain effective as sea level and storm frequency change.
Environmental and permitting questions: Multiple commenters urged commissioners to note that no applications had been filed with state agencies as of the meeting. Citizens and St. Marys Riverkeeper representatives described additional approvals that the developer would need before work could begin, including permits from the Georgia Department of Natural Resources and, where applicable, a jurisdictional determination and permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for dredge‑and‑fill or impacts to wetlands and tidal waters. "If those trees are taken out," one speaker said, "FEMA could require broader flood mitigation and the flooding picture could change." Emily Floor, St. Marys Riverkeeper, said the island is “a gem” and urged the board to consider shoreline erosion and habitat when evaluating any future application.
Annexation and process: The board emphasized it had received no annexation or zoning application for Sheffield Island. Chairman Casey read a short statement explaining that if developers make formal requests they would first be reviewed by county planning and zoning staff, then by the Planning & Zoning Board and finally by the commission, with additional public hearings. One county staff member reiterated that because the property does not abut Kingsland, an annexation would require agreement between the county and city; speakers noted annexation could shift tax revenues and responsibilities for infrastructure.
Infrastructure and emergency access: Several speakers raised emergency‑access and evacuation concerns, noting that existing bridges and causeways in the area sometimes flood and that evacuation for existing neighborhoods has required county emergency declarations. Commenters asked who would pay for culvert or bridge upgrades and whether a single emergency exit would be adequate for thousands of new daily trips described in traffic studies presented by developers at community meetings.
Board response and next steps: Commissioners said they would not act tonight and reiterated the county’s process: no action can be taken until formal applications and staff reviews are received. Commissioners encouraged residents to follow the formal review process — which includes multiple public hearings — and directed staff to continue coordinating with adjacent jurisdictions and to ensure public notices are made if an application is filed.
Ending: The board closed public comment and said it would take no immediate vote; residents were urged to watch for formal submissions to county planning staff and for public notices before any vote is scheduled.
