Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Supervision Revocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judge grants revocation; Michael Armando Rivera sentenced to 10 years
Summary
Michael Armando Rivera pleaded true to an alleged supervision violation; Judge Stephanie Boyd granted the state's motion to revoke, sentenced Rivera to 10 years in prison and ordered the sentence to run concurrent to a related federal matter, with waiver of appeal recorded.
Get email alerts on the Community Supervision Revocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The 187th District Court granted the state's motion to revoke community supervision and sentenced Michael Armando Rivera to 10 years in prison; the court ordered the term to run concurrent with a related federal case.
The court called cause number 20195302. Lauren Esmeadez announced for the state; Rivera appeared and acknowledged his placement on community supervision in 2019 for possession with intent to deliver (penalty group 1). The state alleged a violation of condition number 1. Rivera answered "True" on the record; the state waived remaining allegations.
Judge Stephanie Boyd confirmed Rivera understood a plea of true could result in a sentence up to 10 years and accepted Rivera's plea. The proposed agreement recorded on the docket was that the court would grant the state's motion to revoke and sentence Rivera to 10 years in prison. Judge Boyd granted the motion, sentenced Rivera to 10 years, and directed that the sentence run concurrent with docketed federal matter SA 20 MJ 1083. The record shows Rivera waived his right to appeal as part of the plea agreement. The court also ordered conditions limiting residence and unsupervised contact with minors.
Counsel and the court discussed entry of the federal judgment and calculation of credit for time served; the judge instructed the clerk to ensure the judgment and calculations were forwarded to the parties and corrections authorities. Rivera addressed the court at allocution, acknowledged past mistakes and stated he hoped to change his life; the court admonished him about the long-term consequences of future criminal activity and employment barriers following a felony conviction.

