Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners ask staff to explore contracting options for animal services and shelter operations
Summary
County manager was directed by consensus to investigate whether animal services and shelter operations could be run by an outside agency or contractor, and to report back with legal and operational options.
Macon County commissioners gave staff a consensus directive to study whether animal services and shelter operations could be provided by an outside agency or under contract rather than managed by the county.
What the board asked staff to do County Manager Cabe told the board staff would need to examine legal issues and identify potential partners and costs; he asked for a general consensus to explore the option rather than an immediate formal vote. Commissioner Shields asked whether the dangerous‑dog board liaison should be involved because dangerous‑dog cases can raise additional legal considerations. The manager and counsel will consult and return with a report.
Scope of the review Staff said the review would include: legal constraints on outsourcing animal control, the county's obligations under current ordinances, potential contracting partners (nonprofit or private providers), anticipated service levels, and financial implications. Commissioners agreed the study would be a discovery exercise to determine feasibility rather than an immediate policy change.
Outcome The board reached a five‑member consensus (no formal roll‑call recorded) directing the county manager and county attorney to explore contracting options and report back with findings.
Direct quote County Manager Cabe: "If you want to pursue that further…that just directs me to explore what options are out there and see if it's a feasible option for you to look at in the future."
